ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Feb 2026
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
March 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
January 2026
Latest News
Fusion energy: Progress, partnerships, and the path to deployment
Over the past decade, fusion energy has moved decisively from scientific aspiration toward a credible pathway to a new energy technology. Thanks to long-term federal support, we have significantly advanced our fundamental understanding of plasma physics—the behavior of the superheated gases at the heart of fusion devices. This knowledge will enable the creation and control of fusion fuel under conditions required for future power plants. Our progress is exemplified by breakthroughs at the National Ignition Facility and the Joint European Torus.
Rofida H. Khlifa, Nicolay N. Nikitenkov, Viktor N. Kudiiarov
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 198 | Number 4 | April 2024 | Pages 825-831
Research Article | doi.org/10.1080/00295639.2023.2224464
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Chromium carbide (CrC) coatings were proposed as an accident-tolerant fuel complementary concept to provide enhanced protection for the inner side of nuclear fuel claddings, with preliminary results showing promising performance. To evaluate the neutronics performance of CrC coatings, a reactor physics–based analysis was performed. A single VVER-1200 fuel assembly was used as a model, and the Monte Carlo code MCNPX was used to perform the calculations. Results were compared to previous work on metallic chromium performance as inner-side coating material. Results showed that CrC coatings generally have less negative impacts on neutronics performance compared to chromium coatings. Neutron flux spectra showed slight reductions in the thermal energy region that reached up to −0.6% in a 40-µm CrC internally coated fuel assembly at an energy of 0.025 eV. The analysis of CrC internally coated fuel assembly nuclide inventories showed a relative increase in the isotopic concentration of some nuclides such as 239Pu and 241Pu, which was less than 1% for the cases considered. Comparing the calculated negative neutronics impacts, such as thermal neutron flux and fuel assembly operating time reductions, caused by CrC and Cr coating materials, the study revealed that the difference between these induced negative neutronics impacts is proportional to coating thickness. Therefore, CrC coatings will be most effective in terms of mitigating negative neutronics impacts when the specified coating thickness is large.