ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
May 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
June 2026
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Getting back to yes: A local perspective on decommissioning, restart, and responsibility
For 45 years, Duane Arnold Energy Center operated in Linn County, Ia., near the town of Palo and just northwest of Cedar Rapids. The facility, owned by NextEra Energy, was the only nuclear power plant in the state.
In August 2020, a historic derecho swept across eastern Iowa with winds approaching 140 miles per hour. Damage to the plant’s cooling towers accelerated a shutdown that had already been planned, and the facility entered decommissioning soon after, with its fuel removed in October of that year. Iowa’s only nuclear plant had gone off line.
Today the national energy landscape looks very different than it did just six short years ago. Electricity demand is rising rapidly as data centers, artificial intelligence infrastructure, advanced manufacturing, and electrification expand across the country. Reliable, carbon-free baseload power has become increasingly valuable. In that context, Linn County has approved the rezoning necessary to support the recommissioning and restart of Duane Arnold and is actively supporting NextEra’s efforts to secure the remaining state and federal approvals.
Rofida H. Khlifa, Nicolay N. Nikitenkov, Viktor N. Kudiiarov
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 198 | Number 4 | April 2024 | Pages 825-831
Research Article | doi.org/10.1080/00295639.2023.2224464
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Chromium carbide (CrC) coatings were proposed as an accident-tolerant fuel complementary concept to provide enhanced protection for the inner side of nuclear fuel claddings, with preliminary results showing promising performance. To evaluate the neutronics performance of CrC coatings, a reactor physics–based analysis was performed. A single VVER-1200 fuel assembly was used as a model, and the Monte Carlo code MCNPX was used to perform the calculations. Results were compared to previous work on metallic chromium performance as inner-side coating material. Results showed that CrC coatings generally have less negative impacts on neutronics performance compared to chromium coatings. Neutron flux spectra showed slight reductions in the thermal energy region that reached up to −0.6% in a 40-µm CrC internally coated fuel assembly at an energy of 0.025 eV. The analysis of CrC internally coated fuel assembly nuclide inventories showed a relative increase in the isotopic concentration of some nuclides such as 239Pu and 241Pu, which was less than 1% for the cases considered. Comparing the calculated negative neutronics impacts, such as thermal neutron flux and fuel assembly operating time reductions, caused by CrC and Cr coating materials, the study revealed that the difference between these induced negative neutronics impacts is proportional to coating thickness. Therefore, CrC coatings will be most effective in terms of mitigating negative neutronics impacts when the specified coating thickness is large.
