ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Jan 2026
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
February 2026
Nuclear Technology
December 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
November 2025
Latest News
The top 10 states of nuclear
The past few years have seen a concerted effort from many U.S. states to encourage nuclear development. The momentum behind nuclear-friendly policies has grown considerably, with many states repealing moratoriums, courting nuclear developers and suppliers, and in some cases creating advisory groups and road maps to push deployment of new nuclear reactors.
Peter Jansson, Martin Bengtsson, Ulrika Bäckström, Francisco Álvarez-Velarde, Dušan Čalič, Stefano Caruso, Ron Dagan, Luca Fiorito, Lydie Giot, Kevin Govers, Augusto Hernandez Solis, Volker Hannstein, Germina Ilas, Marjan Kromar, Jaakko Leppänen, Marita Mosconi, Pedro Ortego, Rita Plukienė, Arturas Plukis, Anssu Ranta-Aho, Dimitri Rochman, Linus Ros, Shunsuke Sato, Peter Schillebeeckx, Ahmed Shama, Teodosi Simeonov, Alexey Stankovskiy, Holly Trellue, Stefano Vaccaro, Vanessa Vallet, Marc Verwerft, Gašper Žerovnik, Anders Sjöland
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 196 | Number 9 | September 2022 | Pages 1125-1145
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.1080/00295639.2022.2053489
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The decay heat rate of five spent nuclear fuel assemblies of the pressurized water reactor type were measured by calorimetry at the interim storage for spent nuclear fuel in Sweden. Calculations of the decay heat rate of the five assemblies were performed by 20 organizations using different codes and nuclear data libraries resulting in 31 results for each assembly, spanning most of the current state-of-the-art practice. The calculations were based on a selected subset of information, such as reactor operating history and fuel assembly properties. The relative difference between the measured and average calculated decay heat rate ranged from 0.6% to 3.3% for the five assemblies. The standard deviation of these relative differences ranged from 1.9% to 2.4%.