ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Fuel Cycle & Waste Management
Devoted to all aspects of the nuclear fuel cycle including waste management, worldwide. Division specific areas of interest and involvement include uranium conversion and enrichment; fuel fabrication, management (in-core and ex-core) and recycle; transportation; safeguards; high-level, low-level and mixed waste management and disposal; public policy and program management; decontamination and decommissioning environmental restoration; and excess weapons materials disposition.
Meeting Spotlight
2025 ANS Annual Conference
June 15–18, 2025
Chicago, IL|Chicago Marriott Downtown
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
May 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
July 2025
Nuclear Technology
June 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
High-temperature plumbing and advanced reactors
The use of nuclear fission power and its role in impacting climate change is hotly debated. Fission advocates argue that short-term solutions would involve the rapid deployment of Gen III+ nuclear reactors, like Vogtle-3 and -4, while long-term climate change impact would rely on the creation and implementation of Gen IV reactors, “inherently safe” reactors that use passive laws of physics and chemistry rather than active controls such as valves and pumps to operate safely. While Gen IV reactors vary in many ways, one thing unites nearly all of them: the use of exotic, high-temperature coolants. These fluids, like molten salts and liquid metals, can enable reactor engineers to design much safer nuclear reactors—ultimately because the boiling point of each fluid is extremely high. Fluids that remain liquid over large temperature ranges can provide good heat transfer through many demanding conditions, all with minimal pressurization. Although the most apparent use for these fluids is advanced fission power, they have the potential to be applied to other power generation sources such as fusion, thermal storage, solar, or high-temperature process heat.1–3
Andrew T. Till, Marvin L. Adams, Jim E. Morel
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 196 | Number 1 | January 2022 | Pages 53-74
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.1080/00295639.2021.1932224
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Energy discretization of the transport equation is difficult due to numerous strong, narrow cross-section (XS) resonances. The standard traditional multigroup (MG) method can be sensitive to approximations in the weighting spectrum chosen for XS averaging, which can lead to inaccurate treatment of important phenomena such as self-shielding. We generalize the concept of a group to a discontiguous range of energies to create the Finite-Element with Discontiguous-Support (FEDS) method. FEDS uses clustering algorithms from machine learning to determine optimal definitions of discontiguous groups. By combining parts of multiple resonances into the same group, FEDS can accurately treat resonance behavior even when the number of groups is orders of magnitude smaller than the number of resonances. In this paper, we introduce the theory of the FEDS method and describe the workflow needed to use FEDS, noting that ordinary MG codes can use FEDS XSs without modification, provided these codes can handle upscattering. This allows existing MG codes to produce FEDS solutions. In the context of light water reactors, we investigate properties of FEDS XSs compared to MG XSs and compare -eigenvalue and reaction rate quantities of interest to continuous-energy Monte Carlo, showing that FEDS provides higher accuracy and less cancellation of error than MG with expert-chosen group structures.