ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Education, Training & Workforce Development
The Education, Training & Workforce Development Division provides communication among the academic, industrial, and governmental communities through the exchange of views and information on matters related to education, training and workforce development in nuclear and radiological science, engineering, and technology. Industry leaders, education and training professionals, and interested students work together through Society-sponsored meetings and publications, to enrich their professional development, to educate the general public, and to advance nuclear and radiological science and engineering.
Meeting Spotlight
2025 ANS Annual Conference
June 15–18, 2025
Chicago, IL|Chicago Marriott Downtown
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
May 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
July 2025
Nuclear Technology
June 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
High-temperature plumbing and advanced reactors
The use of nuclear fission power and its role in impacting climate change is hotly debated. Fission advocates argue that short-term solutions would involve the rapid deployment of Gen III+ nuclear reactors, like Vogtle-3 and -4, while long-term climate change impact would rely on the creation and implementation of Gen IV reactors, “inherently safe” reactors that use passive laws of physics and chemistry rather than active controls such as valves and pumps to operate safely. While Gen IV reactors vary in many ways, one thing unites nearly all of them: the use of exotic, high-temperature coolants. These fluids, like molten salts and liquid metals, can enable reactor engineers to design much safer nuclear reactors—ultimately because the boiling point of each fluid is extremely high. Fluids that remain liquid over large temperature ranges can provide good heat transfer through many demanding conditions, all with minimal pressurization. Although the most apparent use for these fluids is advanced fission power, they have the potential to be applied to other power generation sources such as fusion, thermal storage, solar, or high-temperature process heat.1–3
Valerio Mascolino, Alireza Haghighat, Luka Snoj
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 195 | Number 9 | September 2021 | Pages 937-953
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.1080/00295639.2021.1890321
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
In this paper, detailed verification and experimental validation of the formulations and algorithms of the Multi-stage Response-function Transport (MRT)–based Real-time Analysis for Particle-transport and In-situ Detection (RAPID) code system is presented. In particular, RAPID’s fission matrix formulation for eigenvalue calculations and its detector response function for reaction rate calculations have been examined in this study. As part of a collaboration between Virginia Tech and the Jožef Stefan Institute (JSI), RAPID is used to simulate dosimetry experiments performed at the JSI TRIGA Mark II reactor. In these measurements, wire dosimeters are irradiated at different axial and radial locations in the reactor, and their signature activity is measured. The RAPID calculations require the determination of the fission neutron source distribution and the Au(n,)Au reaction rates in the wires. In addition, the Monte Carlo code Serpent is used for comparison of the RAPID-calculated criticality eigenvalue, three-dimensional fission neutron source distribution. The validation results show excellent agreement of RAPID with both the experiments and the reference Serpent calculation, with an average relative difference of about 3% with respect to the measurements.