ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2025 ANS Winter Conference & Expo
November 9–12, 2025
Washington, DC|Washington Hilton
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Sep 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
October 2025
Latest News
Empowering the next generation: ANS’s newest book focuses on careers in nuclear energy
A new career guide for the nuclear energy industry is now available: The Nuclear Empowered Workforce by Earnestine Johnson. Drawing on more than 30 years of experience across 16 nuclear facilities, Johnson offers a practical, insightful look into some of the many career paths available in commercial nuclear power. To mark the release, Johnson sat down with Nuclear News for a wide-ranging conversation about her career, her motivation for writing the book, and her advice for the next generation of nuclear professionals.
When Johnson began her career at engineering services company Stone & Webster, she entered a field still reeling from the effects of the Three Mile Island incident in 1979, nearly 15 years earlier. Her hiring cohort was the first group of new engineering graduates the company had brought on since TMI, a reflection of the industry-wide pause in nuclear construction. Her first long-term assignment—at the Millstone site in Waterford, Conn., helping resolve design issues stemming from TMI—marked the beginning of a long and varied career that spanned positions across the country.
C. Vaglio-Gaudard, O. Leray, A. C. Colombier, O. Gueton, J. P. Hudelot, M. Valentini, J. Di Salvo, A. Gruel, J. C. Klein, A. Roche, D. Beretz, B. Geslot, J. M. Girard, C. Jammes, P. Sireta
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 175 | Number 3 | November 2013 | Pages 318-328
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NSE12-67
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A new experimental program, named AMMON, was performed between late 2010 and early 2013 in the EOLE zero-power experimental reactor at CEA Cadarache. It is dedicated to the analysis of the neutron and photon physics of the Jules Horowitz Reactor (JHR), the next international materials testing reactor under construction in France. The objective of the program is to provide measurement data for the experimental validation of the calculation tools developed for the JHR design and safety studies. The first core configuration, the so-called reference configuration, was loaded in 2012; it consisted of an experimental zone of seven JHR assemblies with U3Si2-Al, 27% 235U enriched fuel curved plates surrounded by a driver zone with 622 standard pressurized water reactor uranium oxide fuel pins. It has been instrumented and studied throughout the first year of the experimental program.The final analysis of the AMMON/REF neutron measurements is presented in this paper. It is based on calculations performed with the three-dimensional reference Monte Carlo TRIPOLI-4.7 code and the JEFF3.1.1 European library. The comparison between calculation and experiment makes it possible to calibrate the bias due to nuclear data on the calculated neutron parameters. It highlights good agreement between calculation and experiment concerning reactivity, power distribution in the experimental zone, fuel plate conversion ratios, and core kinetics parameters. The reactivity prediction is very satisfactory, despite the presence of a large aluminum quantity in the core: calculation-to-experiment comparison (C - E) = + 365 ± 334 pcm (1). For the other neutron parameters (assembly power distribution, plate conversion ratios, and kinetics parameters), the (C - E)/E discrepancies are within the experimental uncertainty (2).
