ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Dec 2025
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
January 2026
Nuclear Technology
December 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
November 2025
Latest News
What’s the most difficult question you’ve been asked as a maintenance instructor?
Blye Widmar
"Where are the prints?!"
This was the final question in an onslaught of verbal feedback, comments, and critiques I received from my students back in 2019. I had two years of instructor experience and was teaching a class that had been meticulously rehearsed in preparation for an accreditation visit. I knew the training material well and transferred that knowledge effectively enough for all the students to pass the class. As we wrapped up, I asked the students how they felt about my first big system-level class, and they did not hold back.
“Why was the exam from memory when we don’t work from memory in the plant?” “Why didn’t we refer to the vendor documents?” “Why didn’t we practice more on the mock-up?” And so on.
Tim D. Bohm, Mohamed E. Sawan
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 77 | Number 7 | November 2021 | Pages 813-828
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.1080/15361055.2021.1908783
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
In the design of fusion reactors, determining radiation levels due to neutrons and photons (gammas) throughout the reactor and its surroundings is important. Radiation transport codes need to have accurate cross-section libraries in order to produce accurate results. The Fusion Evaluated Nuclear Data Library (FENDL) is an international effort coordinated by the International Atomic Energy Agency, Nuclear Data Section, that assembles a collection of the best nuclear data for fusion applications. In the current FENDL-3.1d data library, neutron cross sections for 65 of the 180 isotopes present in the library come from ENDF/B-VII.1.
Monte Carlo–based neutronics calculations using cross-section libraries from FENDL (versions 2.1 and 3.1d), ENDF/B (versions VII.1 and VIII.0), and candidate new evaluations for key structural elements/isotopes such as iron and chromium were performed. The calculations were performed in reactor-relevant models including a one-dimensional (1-D) cylindrical model of ITER, a three-dimensional (3-D) computer-aided design (CAD)–based model of ITER, and a 3-D CAD-based model of the U.S. Fusion Energy System Studies Fusion Nuclear Science Facility (FNSF).
The results show that neutron fluxes calculated with different cross-section libraries can be as much as 12% higher and as much as 8% lower than those calculated with the reference cross-section library (FENDL-2.1). Nuclear heating calculated with different cross-section libraries can be as much as 14% higher and as much as 8% lower than those calculated with the reference cross-section library. Iron displacements per atom calculated with different cross-section libraries can be as much as 9% higher and as much as 9% lower than those calculated with the reference cross-section library. Helium production calculated with different cross-section libraries can be as much as 19% higher and as much as 2% lower than those calculated with the reference cross-section library. Tritium production in the ITER 1-D model’s nonbreeding regions calculated with different cross-section libraries can be as much as 246% higher and as much as 5% lower than those calculated with the reference cross-section library. The tritium breeding ratio in the FNSF 3-D model calculated with different cross-section libraries averaged 1% higher at the inboard and 1.4% higher at the outboard than those calculated with the reference cross-section library.