ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2026
Nuclear Technology
August 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
The human factor in licensing and operating the next generation of nuclear plants
As human factors specialists working at the intersection of human performance and nuclear operations, we are witnessing one of the nuclear sector’s most significant transitions in decades. The emergence of small modular reactors, microreactors, and other advanced designs is reshaping the industry’s landscape. Digital instrumentation and controls, passive safety systems, and increased automation are creating opportunities for greater safety margins and more flexible operation. These same features also fundamentally redefine what it means to “operate” a nuclear plant. Interactions among human roles, automation, and passive systems shape how people maintain awareness, exercise judgment, and intervene when necessary. These developments affect both operational realities and the regulatory foundations on which nuclear safety is built.
Claudia Picoco, Valentin Rychkov
Nuclear Science and Engineering | Volume 197 | Number 11 | November 2023 | Pages 2778-2786
PSA 2021 Paper | doi.org/10.1080/00295639.2023.2196227
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A probabilistic safety assessment (PSA) is used to estimate potential risks associated with a nuclear power plant. Event trees (ETs) and fault trees (FTs) describe accident scenarios following initiating events. They allow for identifying and quantifying the consequence frequencies. Based on success criteria, support studies are used to determine each scenario’s consequence. They are also used to define the time available for the operators to carry out the actions involved in the scenario, and consequently, the corresponding human failure probability.
In this paper, we use a dynamic PSA toolbox to optimize support studies for a classical (ET/FT) PSA model. We analyze medium-break loss-of-coolant accident (LOCA) initiating events with the possible failure of the high-pressure safety injection (HPSI) system for an internal event Level 1 PSA for a pressurized water reactor plant. In order to prevent core uncovery and subsequent core damage, operators must depressurize the primary circuit to reach the low-pressure safety injection set point. This scenario represents a significant contribution to the core damage frequency. The dominant cut sets corresponding to this scenario involve HPSI failure to run over 24 h, while the thermal-hydraulic analysis supporting the human reliability assessment (HRA) analysis for this sequence assumes the unavailability of HPSI pumps at the beginning of the accident.
We update the thermal-hydraulic assumptions in the support study by performing simulations for different values of the HPSI failure time. We find that even a short HPSI operation time buys significant (from the HRA point of view) available time for operators and drives significant improvement in estimating the human error probability (HEP). We postprocessed the minimal cut-set probability by integrating the obtained HEP. This result allows for more realistic quantification of the contribution of the medium-break LOCA in the core damage frequency.