ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
September 8–11, 2025
Atlanta, GA|Atlanta Marriott Marquis
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2025
Latest News
Nuclear Dirigo
On April 22, 1959, Rear Admiral George J. King, superintendent of the Maine Maritime Academy, announced that following the completion of the 1960 training cruise, cadets would begin the study of nuclear engineering. Courses at that time included radiation physics, reactor control and instrumentation, reactor theory and engineering, thermodynamics, shielding, core design, reactor maintenance, and nuclear aspects.
Min Seop Song, Eung Soo Kim (Seoul Natl Univ), Jae Ho Jeong (KAERI)
Proceedings | Advances in Thermal Hydraulics 2018 | Orlando, FL, November 11-15, 2018 | Pages 531-546
The wire-wrapped pin bundle is the most commonly adopted form of the fuel assembly in SFRs. It is challenging to measure the local flow velocity field experimentally because of its narrow channel and complex internal shape. In this study, the refractive indices of the fluid and the test-section are matched and the flow field in the SFR wire-wrapped 19-pin bundle is visualized using optical measurement techniques such as PIV/LDV and compared with the RANS-based computational fluid dynamic (CFD) analysis. According to the turbulence intensity and the pressure drop measurements, it is observed that the flow regime changes from the transition regime to the fully turbulent regime when the Re number is more than 13,000. In addition, the pressure drop measurement results are compared with the CFD analysis for various turbulence models, and it is found that the BSL-RSM model predicts the experimental results the most accurately. The velocity distribution obtained in the edge sub-channel using PIV is also compared with the CFD results. As a result, the flow and vortex shapes are very similar to each other qualitatively. However, some discrepancies are observed quantitatively in the region where the channel thickness is narrow. The main reason is considered to be attributed to the pin location error, the refraction of light and the velocity averaging due to the thickness of the laser sheet incident on the thin channel during the experiment. Further investigation is on-going for analysis of flow in interior subchannel.