ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Feb 2026
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
March 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
January 2026
Latest News
Mirion announces appointments
Mirion Technologies has announced three senior leadership appointments designed to support its global nuclear and medical businesses while advancing a company-wide digital and AI strategy. The leadership changes come as Mirion seeks to advance innovation and maintain strong performance in nuclear energy, radiation safety, and medical applications.
Su-Jong Yoon, Gilles J. Youinou (INL)
Proceedings | Advances in Thermal Hydraulics 2018 | Orlando, FL, November 11-15, 2018 | Pages 482-492
The Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) modeling of wire-wrapped fuel assembly is challenging due to the geometric complexity and many contacts between the wire and fuel rod. To obtain the reliable and accurate predictions in pressure drop, velocity and temperature fields of wire-wrapped geometry, the uncertainty of CFD model should be identified and minimized. The present study conducted the sensitivity tests of pressure drop, velocity and temperature profile to the mesh density, boundary layer mesh and turbulence model by employing a commercially available CFD software, STAR-CCM+ version 12.06.010. The fluid-only and conjugate heat transfer models with 7-pin fuel assembly were adopted to find the baseline model parameters for the full geometry modeling with 217 pins. The CFD results show that the size of mesh and presence of boundary layer mesh play an important role in predictions of the pressure drop. The effects of mesh size, boundary layer mesh and turbulence model on the peak temperature of fluid and cladding wall were not significant. The fluid-only model with closed-gap approach could overestimate the peak temperature around the contacts.