ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
March 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
April 2026
Latest News
NRC commissioners talk reforms, roles at Day 1 of RIC 2026
Even a last-minute cancelation from Department of Energy Secretary Chris Wright could not derail the optimism permeating day 1 of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s annual Regulatory Information Conference (RIC).
The optimistic theme came up several times during the morning plenary sessions that highlighted Tuesday’s agenda. The NRC commissioners who spoke said the optimism was a result of the “nuclear renaissance” they are encountering that feels different from past nuclear-related revivals that didn’t materialize.
Guanyi Wang, Qingzi Zhu, Mamoru Ishii (Purdue Univ)
Proceedings | Advances in Thermal Hydraulics 2018 | Orlando, FL, November 11-15, 2018 | Pages 77-87
As a critical closure equation to the two-fluid model and an important tool to characterize the two-phase flow interfacial transport, interfacial area transport equation (IATE) was formulated by taking various physical mechanisms causing interface area change into account. To fulfill the dynamic prediction advantage of the IATE and further replace the flow-regime-based constitutive relations, the IATE model should be validated by transition data to ensure the model reliability and robustness. Air-water experiments are performed in bubbly to slug transitions flows in a 200×10 mm narrow rectangular duct. Four-sensor conductivity probes are used to measure the local void fraction, interfacial area concentration, and bubble velocity at three axial locations. The sectional void fraction distribution changes significantly with the flow developing. Flow conditions with similar area-averaged void fraction but different superficial mixture velocities are compared, and it is found that the superficial liquid velocity obviously affect the interfacial area concentration. The measured data with developing spatial distribution would be useful to benchmark and improve the current two-phase flow models used in CFD. Besides, the two-group IATE model for narrow rectangular channel is evaluated using the collected data. The average relative error for the interfacial area concentration prediction is 11.4%, but the group II IAC are overestimated for most flow conditions. To realize better prediction in bubbly to slug transition flows, improvement of the current IATE model is required.