ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2026
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2026
Latest News
The transformation of the NRC: 50 years of commissioners
The dust is beginning to settle following the whirlwind of changes at the Nuclear Regulatory Commission over the past year, and 2025 ultimately may be viewed as a transformative year, as well as the year the NRC celebrated its golden anniversary. The 12 months of that milestone year brought more change to the agency in its composition, its mandate, and its relationship to the executive branch than any comparable period in the preceding four decades.
Now at 51 years and counting, the NRC is working with a full commission and issuing new rulemakings to both regulate and support the next round of nuclear deployments. With the turbulence of 2025 still fresh in our minds, Nuclear News decided it was a good time to revisit the professional backgrounds of all 42 NRC commissioners who have served over the agency’s 50-year history to see how the composition of the commission has evolved over time.
Kenji Yokoyama (JAEA), Takanori Kitada (Osaka Univ)
Proceedings | 2018 International Congress on Advances in Nuclear Power Plants (ICAPP 2018) | Charlotte, NC, April 8-11, 2018 | Pages 1221-1230
As a method to improve the design prediction accuracy by utilizing integral experimental data, the conventional cross-section adjustment method (CA) based on Bayes the- orem is widely used. On the other hand, propositions of the generalized bias factor method (GB) in 2006 and the extended bias factor method (EB) in 2007 have stimulated theoretical study in this field. Subsequently, several new cross-section adjustment methods were proposed: the ex- tended cross-section adjustment method (EA); the cross- section adjustment methods based on minimum variance unbiased estimation (MVUE), which include the MVUE- based rigorous EA (MREA) and the MVUE-based rigorous CA (MRCA); and the dimension-reduced cross-section ad- justment method (DRCA). In the present paper, we applied these methods to a real-scale problem of design prediction accuracy evaluation for a large-size sodium cooled fast re- actor and compared their performances. From these re- sults, we discuss a proper use of these design methods.