ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2026
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2026
Latest News
The transformation of the NRC: 50 years of commissioners
The dust is beginning to settle following the whirlwind of changes at the Nuclear Regulatory Commission over the past year, and 2025 ultimately may be viewed as a transformative year, as well as the year the NRC celebrated its golden anniversary. The 12 months of that milestone year brought more change to the agency in its composition, its mandate, and its relationship to the executive branch than any comparable period in the preceding four decades.
Now at 51 years and counting, the NRC is working with a full commission and issuing new rulemakings to both regulate and support the next round of nuclear deployments. With the turbulence of 2025 still fresh in our minds, Nuclear News decided it was a good time to revisit the professional backgrounds of all 42 NRC commissioners who have served over the agency’s 50-year history to see how the composition of the commission has evolved over time.
Yudai Tasaki, Akifumi Yamaji (Waseda Univ)
Proceedings | 2018 International Congress on Advances in Nuclear Power Plants (ICAPP 2018) | Charlotte, NC, April 8-11, 2018 | Pages 1144-1152
The concept of “multi-axial fuel shuffling” has been recently proposed for a high breeding core design of supercritical- water cooled reactor. In this study, the same design principle is applied to boiling water reactor (BWR) condition. The results show that the Compound System Doubling Time (CSDT) can be reduced by increasing fuel batch number of the upper blanket layer, but more investigations may be necessary to consider further improvement of the core breeding performance.
Moreover, fuel performance of the axially heterogeneous core has been evaluated with the power history obtained by the core calculations and modified FEMAXI-7 code which consider two different types of pellets (i.e., MOX and depleted uranium) within one fuel rod. The analysis results indicate that uncertainty in thermal conductivity of MOX pellets may be important in evaluating the peak pellet temperature, while relatively large plenum volume may be required at the bottom of the fuel rod to accommodate the large amount of fission gas release. Another potential design issue may be the cladding outer diameter increase by the MOX pellet swelling, which may have significant influence on evaluation of MCHFR.