ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Nov 2025
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
December 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
November 2025
Latest News
Education and training to support Canadian nuclear workforce development
Along with several other nations, Canada has committed to net-zero emissions by 2050. Part of this plan is tripling nuclear generating capacity. As of 2025, the country has four operating nuclear generating stations with a total of 17 reactors, 16 of which are in the province of Ontario. The Independent Electricity System Operator has recommended that an additional 17,800 MWe of nuclear power be added to Ontario’s grid.
Yudai Tasaki, Akifumi Yamaji (Waseda Univ)
Proceedings | 2018 International Congress on Advances in Nuclear Power Plants (ICAPP 2018) | Charlotte, NC, April 8-11, 2018 | Pages 1144-1152
The concept of “multi-axial fuel shuffling” has been recently proposed for a high breeding core design of supercritical- water cooled reactor. In this study, the same design principle is applied to boiling water reactor (BWR) condition. The results show that the Compound System Doubling Time (CSDT) can be reduced by increasing fuel batch number of the upper blanket layer, but more investigations may be necessary to consider further improvement of the core breeding performance.
Moreover, fuel performance of the axially heterogeneous core has been evaluated with the power history obtained by the core calculations and modified FEMAXI-7 code which consider two different types of pellets (i.e., MOX and depleted uranium) within one fuel rod. The analysis results indicate that uncertainty in thermal conductivity of MOX pellets may be important in evaluating the peak pellet temperature, while relatively large plenum volume may be required at the bottom of the fuel rod to accommodate the large amount of fission gas release. Another potential design issue may be the cladding outer diameter increase by the MOX pellet swelling, which may have significant influence on evaluation of MCHFR.