ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jun 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
July 2026
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Two steps forward for U.K. advanced nuclear
This week, two significant announcements have emerged from the United Kingdom’s advanced reactor sector.
On June 14, Rolls-Royce, the United Kingdom National Nuclear Laboratory, and the Japan Atomic Energy Agency announced that they had signed two trilateral memorandums of cooperation to collaborate on “advanced modular reactor (AMR) technology, specifically high-temperature gas-cooled reactors (HTGR), and the coated particle fuel these reactors will use.”
Separately, on June 16, Bellevue, Wash.–based TerraPower announced that its Natrium reactor design has been formally submitted for U.K. regulatory review. The company also announced the formation of a new subsidiary, TerraPower UK Ltd.
Jun Wang (Univ of Wisconsin, Madison), Anil Gurgen (MIT), Michael L. Corradini (Univ of Wisconsin, Madison), Koroush Shirvan (MIT)
Proceedings | 2018 International Congress on Advances in Nuclear Power Plants (ICAPP 2018) | Charlotte, NC, April 8-11, 2018 | Pages 755-762
In order to compare the thermal hydraulics system response to Accident Tolerant Fuel (ATF) materials, a benchmark was performed for early accident progression behavior given a Station Blackout scenario. Thermal hydraulic parameters such as the pressurizer pressure, reactor pressure vessel (RPV) water level, peak cladding temperature, and hydrogen mass generated were quantified by the TRACE code by a team at MIT and compared to MELCOR by a team at UW Madison. This benchmark comparison with TRACE and MELCOR used the same initial conditions for a simplified generic PWR plant model. This PWR model was based on a 2200MWth conventional light water reactor plant. The benchmark work included the input model development and the simulation comparisons for the thermal hydraulic response, pressurizer relief valve operation, and the clad oxidation. The Zircaloy cladding case and FeCrAl cladding case were compared in the current simulation. The result showed good agreement between TRACE and MELCOR for overall event timing and key parameters. The exothermic energy release from Zircaloy and FeCrAl clad oxidation were calculated and compared. The difference in oxidation energy between the clad materials was quite small when compared to decay heat values.