ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2026
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2026
Latest News
The transformation of the NRC: 50 years of commissioners
The dust is beginning to settle following the whirlwind of changes at the Nuclear Regulatory Commission over the past year, and 2025 ultimately may be viewed as a transformative year, as well as the year the NRC celebrated its golden anniversary. The 12 months of that milestone year brought more change to the agency in its composition, its mandate, and its relationship to the executive branch than any comparable period in the preceding four decades.
Now at 51 years and counting, the NRC is working with a full commission and issuing new rulemakings to both regulate and support the next round of nuclear deployments. With the turbulence of 2025 still fresh in our minds, Nuclear News decided it was a good time to revisit the professional backgrounds of all 42 NRC commissioners who have served over the agency’s 50-year history to see how the composition of the commission has evolved over time.
Jun Wang (Univ of Wisconsin, Madison), Anil Gurgen (MIT), Michael L. Corradini (Univ of Wisconsin, Madison), Koroush Shirvan (MIT)
Proceedings | 2018 International Congress on Advances in Nuclear Power Plants (ICAPP 2018) | Charlotte, NC, April 8-11, 2018 | Pages 755-762
In order to compare the thermal hydraulics system response to Accident Tolerant Fuel (ATF) materials, a benchmark was performed for early accident progression behavior given a Station Blackout scenario. Thermal hydraulic parameters such as the pressurizer pressure, reactor pressure vessel (RPV) water level, peak cladding temperature, and hydrogen mass generated were quantified by the TRACE code by a team at MIT and compared to MELCOR by a team at UW Madison. This benchmark comparison with TRACE and MELCOR used the same initial conditions for a simplified generic PWR plant model. This PWR model was based on a 2200MWth conventional light water reactor plant. The benchmark work included the input model development and the simulation comparisons for the thermal hydraulic response, pressurizer relief valve operation, and the clad oxidation. The Zircaloy cladding case and FeCrAl cladding case were compared in the current simulation. The result showed good agreement between TRACE and MELCOR for overall event timing and key parameters. The exothermic energy release from Zircaloy and FeCrAl clad oxidation were calculated and compared. The difference in oxidation energy between the clad materials was quite small when compared to decay heat values.