ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
September 8–11, 2025
Atlanta, GA|Atlanta Marriott Marquis
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
August 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
July 2025
Latest News
NRC approves V.C. Summer’s second license renewal
Dominion Energy’s V.C. Summer nuclear power plant, in Jenkinsville, S.C., has been authorized to operate for 80 years, until August 2062, following the renewal of its operating license by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission for a second time.
Jarmo Kalilainen, Haeseong Kim, Abdel Dehbi, Terttaliisa Lind (PSI)
Proceedings | 2018 International Congress on Advances in Nuclear Power Plants (ICAPP 2018) | Charlotte, NC, April 8-11, 2018 | Pages 571-577
Particle depletion in an enclosure with turbulent natural convection was investigated using severe accident code MELCOR 2.1. A model of the experimental DIANA facility was created and the results of the simulation were compared against the experimental and LES data from earlier work. Three particle sizes 0.5 ?m, 1.0 ?m and 2.5 ?m were used in the study. The temperature difference between the vertical isothermal walls of the enclosure was varied between 40 K, 20 K and 10 K. The MELCOR model reproduced the stratified temperature field and the encircling natural convective flow in the cavity qualitatively. The deposition rate was well matched between the MELCOR and experimental data, but further analysis indicated that the thermophoresis was overestimated in the MELCOR modeling, thus compensating for the turbulent deposition, which was not considered in this MELCOR simulation work.