ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2026
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2026
Latest News
The transformation of the NRC: 50 years of commissioners
The dust is beginning to settle following the whirlwind of changes at the Nuclear Regulatory Commission over the past year, and 2025 ultimately may be viewed as a transformative year, as well as the year the NRC celebrated its golden anniversary. The 12 months of that milestone year brought more change to the agency in its composition, its mandate, and its relationship to the executive branch than any comparable period in the preceding four decades.
Now at 51 years and counting, the NRC is working with a full commission and issuing new rulemakings to both regulate and support the next round of nuclear deployments. With the turbulence of 2025 still fresh in our minds, Nuclear News decided it was a good time to revisit the professional backgrounds of all 42 NRC commissioners who have served over the agency’s 50-year history to see how the composition of the commission has evolved over time.
Jarmo Kalilainen, Haeseong Kim, Abdel Dehbi, Terttaliisa Lind (PSI)
Proceedings | 2018 International Congress on Advances in Nuclear Power Plants (ICAPP 2018) | Charlotte, NC, April 8-11, 2018 | Pages 571-577
Particle depletion in an enclosure with turbulent natural convection was investigated using severe accident code MELCOR 2.1. A model of the experimental DIANA facility was created and the results of the simulation were compared against the experimental and LES data from earlier work. Three particle sizes 0.5 ?m, 1.0 ?m and 2.5 ?m were used in the study. The temperature difference between the vertical isothermal walls of the enclosure was varied between 40 K, 20 K and 10 K. The MELCOR model reproduced the stratified temperature field and the encircling natural convective flow in the cavity qualitatively. The deposition rate was well matched between the MELCOR and experimental data, but further analysis indicated that the thermophoresis was overestimated in the MELCOR modeling, thus compensating for the turbulent deposition, which was not considered in this MELCOR simulation work.