ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Apr 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
April 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
May 2026
Latest News
Who’s in the running for DOE Nuclear Lifecycle Innovation Campuses?
Today is the Department of Energy’s deadline for states to respond to a request for information on proposed Nuclear Lifecycle Innovation Campuses. Issued on January 28, the RFI marks the first step toward potentially establishing voluntary federal-state partnerships designed to build a coherent, end-to-end nuclear fuel cycle strategy for the country, including waste management, according to the DOE.
M. Bradbury, R. Ratnayake (NuScale Power)
Proceedings | 2018 International Congress on Advances in Nuclear Power Plants (ICAPP 2018) | Charlotte, NC, April 8-11, 2018 | Pages 165-171
Data from Critical Heat Flux (CHF) and Critical Power (CP) tests are used for developing CHF and CP (or dryout) correlations to predict the maximum allowable heat flux at points of operational interest. CHF and CP tests are conducted using heater rod arrays representing fuel rods in a partial fuel bundle. Heat is directly generated in these heater rods depicting the axial power distributions of interest. The test rod array is housed in a slender vertical channel of metallic walls that are generally unheated. During testing, part of the heat generated in the heater rods is lost to the environment through the channel walls. Heat loss through the channel wall has the potential to favor channel thermal-hydraulic (T-H) conditions, and thereby make power measurements non-conservative. Typically, a single conservative estimate of the heat loss obtained from a separate isothermal test of the same test configuration is used regardless of the reactor conditions tested during a test campaign. This paper investigates the basis for the use of a single value for channel heat loss under varying reactor conditions. Results indicate that this practice has sound bases when applied with appropriate conservatisms.