ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Feb 2026
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
March 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
January 2026
Latest News
Mirion announces appointments
Mirion Technologies has announced three senior leadership appointments designed to support its global nuclear and medical businesses while advancing a company-wide digital and AI strategy. The leadership changes come as Mirion seeks to advance innovation and maintain strong performance in nuclear energy, radiation safety, and medical applications.
M. Bradbury, R. Ratnayake (NuScale Power)
Proceedings | 2018 International Congress on Advances in Nuclear Power Plants (ICAPP 2018) | Charlotte, NC, April 8-11, 2018 | Pages 165-171
Data from Critical Heat Flux (CHF) and Critical Power (CP) tests are used for developing CHF and CP (or dryout) correlations to predict the maximum allowable heat flux at points of operational interest. CHF and CP tests are conducted using heater rod arrays representing fuel rods in a partial fuel bundle. Heat is directly generated in these heater rods depicting the axial power distributions of interest. The test rod array is housed in a slender vertical channel of metallic walls that are generally unheated. During testing, part of the heat generated in the heater rods is lost to the environment through the channel walls. Heat loss through the channel wall has the potential to favor channel thermal-hydraulic (T-H) conditions, and thereby make power measurements non-conservative. Typically, a single conservative estimate of the heat loss obtained from a separate isothermal test of the same test configuration is used regardless of the reactor conditions tested during a test campaign. This paper investigates the basis for the use of a single value for channel heat loss under varying reactor conditions. Results indicate that this practice has sound bases when applied with appropriate conservatisms.