ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jun 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
July 2026
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Two steps forward for U.K. advanced nuclear
This week, two significant announcements have emerged from the United Kingdom’s advanced reactor sector.
On June 14, Rolls-Royce, the United Kingdom National Nuclear Laboratory, and the Japan Atomic Energy Agency announced that they had signed two trilateral memorandums of cooperation to collaborate on “advanced modular reactor (AMR) technology, specifically high-temperature gas-cooled reactors (HTGR), and the coated particle fuel these reactors will use.”
Separately, on June 16, Bellevue, Wash.–based TerraPower announced that its Natrium reactor design has been formally submitted for U.K. regulatory review. The company also announced the formation of a new subsidiary, TerraPower UK Ltd.
Jarod Wilson, Sara Hauptman, Akshay Dave, Kaichao Sun, Lin-wen Hu (MIT), Ruimin Ji, Yang Zou (CAS)
Proceedings | 2018 International Congress on Advances in Nuclear Power Plants (ICAPP 2018) | Charlotte, NC, April 8-11, 2018 | Pages 76-83
The growing global demand for emission-free energy is creating a market for advanced Generation-IV NPP, and the Fluoride salt-cooled High-temperature Reactor design with a pebble-type fuel is a promising candidate. However, this design also brings unique challenges, namely evaluating the effects of the fuel’s distribution and dynamic movement. Generating explicitly described fuel pebble loading patterns is non-trivial. This study serves two main purposes: 1) to investigate the neutronic performance of pebble type fuel within the TMSR-SF1, and 2) to conduct a preliminary comparison between pebble coordinate generation methods. The first method of coordinate generation, the Discrete Element Method (DEM), is a particle-tracking model which accounts for inter-particle forces. While this method generates packing distributions closer to real-world scenarios, it is computationally intense. The alternative method analyzed is a mathematical model (MM), which fills arbitrary domains through simple geometric rules on the addition of particles. This method, while less realistic, generates coordinates significantly faster. Afterwards, fuel pebble coordinates from both methods are utilized to generate inputs for high-fidelity neutronics modelling. The results of these simulations, with the aid of various tools within Python, allowed for the neutronic analysis of the core, specifically when considering the eigenvalues of each coordinate set, and the fission power distribution within the fuel pebbles. It was found that the packing fraction in the axial direction to be consistent within the MM coordinate generation method, and the general trends similar between it and DEM-generated coordinates. Additionally, the eigenvalues of the simulated core were found to be proportional to the number of pebbles within the core. Finally, the fission power distribution of the cores was found to be qualitatively consistent both within many sets of MM-generated coordinates, and in comparisons of the two coordinate generation methods.