ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
May 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
June 2026
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Getting back to yes: A local perspective on decommissioning, restart, and responsibility
For 45 years, Duane Arnold Energy Center operated in Linn County, Ia., near the town of Palo and just northwest of Cedar Rapids. The facility, owned by NextEra Energy, was the only nuclear power plant in the state.
In August 2020, a historic derecho swept across eastern Iowa with winds approaching 140 miles per hour. Damage to the plant’s cooling towers accelerated a shutdown that had already been planned, and the facility entered decommissioning soon after, with its fuel removed in October of that year. Iowa’s only nuclear plant had gone off line.
Today the national energy landscape looks very different than it did just six short years ago. Electricity demand is rising rapidly as data centers, artificial intelligence infrastructure, advanced manufacturing, and electrification expand across the country. Reliable, carbon-free baseload power has become increasingly valuable. In that context, Linn County has approved the rezoning necessary to support the recommissioning and restart of Duane Arnold and is actively supporting NextEra’s efforts to secure the remaining state and federal approvals.
Christina J. Leggett (NRC)
Proceedings | 16th International High-Level Radioactive Waste Management Conference (IHLRWM 2017) | Charlotte, NC, April 9-13, 2017 | Pages 622-631
The Global Nuclear Energy Partnership (GNEP), a government initiative promulgated in 2006, was in part a plan to close the U.S. nuclear fuel cycle by incorporating advanced burner reactors and industry-led domestic reprocessing. Recognizing the possibility that these facilities could be constructed in the future, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff began reviewing existing regulations to assess the efficiency of licensing and regulating such facilities. Although support for GNEP had waned by 2008, the industry began expressing interest in building commercial reprocessing facilities outside of the GNEP initiative. In response, the staff focused on reviewing gaps related solely to reprocessing facilities. The resulting gap analysis revealed 23 high-, moderate-, and low-priority gaps in existing regulations that could complicate licensing and regulation of reprocessing facilities. In 2011, NRC staff published its Draft Regulatory Basis for Licensing and Regulating Reprocessing Facilities, which provided preliminary recommendations to resolve 19 high- and moderate-priority gaps. Based on these recommendations, the staff proposed to develop a new reprocessing-specific regulation, 10 CFR Part 7X, that would provide a more efficient approach to licensing and regulating reprocessing facilities. The NRC Commission accepted this recommendation and directed staff to begin work on a high priority gap, Gap 5, to address safety and risk considerations for a reprocessing facility and to select a suitable risk assessment methodology for such facilities. Efforts to address Gap 5 were halted in 2016 due to budgetary constraints and higher priority regulatory actions. In this paper, following a brief review of the regulatory history of commercial reprocessing facilities in the U.S., a summary of NRC staff efforts to develop a reprocessing framework, with particular emphasis on the recommendations described in the Draft Regulatory Basis, is presented.