ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
May 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
June 2026
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Getting back to yes: A local perspective on decommissioning, restart, and responsibility
For 45 years, Duane Arnold Energy Center operated in Linn County, Ia., near the town of Palo and just northwest of Cedar Rapids. The facility, owned by NextEra Energy, was the only nuclear power plant in the state.
In August 2020, a historic derecho swept across eastern Iowa with winds approaching 140 miles per hour. Damage to the plant’s cooling towers accelerated a shutdown that had already been planned, and the facility entered decommissioning soon after, with its fuel removed in October of that year. Iowa’s only nuclear plant had gone off line.
Today the national energy landscape looks very different than it did just six short years ago. Electricity demand is rising rapidly as data centers, artificial intelligence infrastructure, advanced manufacturing, and electrification expand across the country. Reliable, carbon-free baseload power has become increasingly valuable. In that context, Linn County has approved the rezoning necessary to support the recommissioning and restart of Duane Arnold and is actively supporting NextEra’s efforts to secure the remaining state and federal approvals.
Bret van den Akker, Abiodun Adeniyi (ORNL), Halim Alsaed (Enviro Nuclear Services), Jim Blink (Beckman & Assoc), Joe Carter, Tom Severynse, Bob Jones (SRNL)
Proceedings | 16th International High-Level Radioactive Waste Management Conference (IHLRWM 2017) | Charlotte, NC, April 9-13, 2017 | Pages 402-409
Spent nuclear fuel (SNF) assemblies are stored in pools or dry casks at commercial reactor sites pending transfer to an interim storage facility (ISF) or a geologic repository for disposal. The cost of disposal will be dependent on the repository’s geology and size, as well as the number and size of waste packages requiring emplacement. To meet acceptance criteria for repository waste package loading, fuel in dry storage may require repackaging into smaller quantities. A modular packaging facility design has been developed for fuel stored in dry casks at reactor sites or an ISF, as well as bare fuel assemblies shipped directly from reactor fuel pools. This facility provides for receipt and packaging of 1,500 metric tons (MT) of fuel annually. Three sizes of storage, transportation and disposal canisters have been evaluated (a 4 pressurized water reactor (PWR)/9 boiling water reactor (BWR) can-in-carrier concept, a 12-PWR/32-BWR fuel canister, and a 21-PWR/44-BWR fuel canister) to determine the effect on facility throughput. Cost estimates have been developed for the packaging facility, and operating costs have been determined for packaging 1,500 MT of SNF per year.
Higher throughputs could be achieved for bare fuel because process steps for transfer and opening of the dual-purpose canister (DPC) are not necessary. Results from system modeling indicate that even for the more restrictive case where all fuel is received in DPCs, the desired throughput of 1,500 MT/year could be attained for the receipt basis of 1,000 MT PWR and 500 MT BWR fuel. Transfer of the fuel from transportation casks (TCs) (bare fuel) or DPCs to disposal canisters would be performed in a pool. The loaded canisters would be sealed, dried, and leak tested prior to being loaded into TCs for transport to a geologic repository or to an ISF. Additional facilities would be provided for decontamination of the TCs for reuse, as well as decontamination of the empty DPCs for disposal as low level radioactive waste (LLW). Conceptual layout and elevation drawings have been developed for a wet packaging facility to provide ~30,000 square feet of process area on two levels for cask and canister handling operations, 9,600 square feet for packaging operations in the fuel handling pool, and ~20,000 square feet for railcar receipt and dispatch of TCs. Capital and annual operating cost estimates have been developed and are in the range of $1.3B–$1.5B for capital costs and $190M–$256M for annual operating costs, depending on the canister chosen for repackaging.