ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jun 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
July 2026
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Two steps forward for U.K. advanced nuclear
This week, two significant announcements have emerged from the United Kingdom’s advanced reactor sector.
On June 14, Rolls-Royce, the United Kingdom National Nuclear Laboratory, and the Japan Atomic Energy Agency announced that they had signed two trilateral memorandums of cooperation to collaborate on “advanced modular reactor (AMR) technology, specifically high-temperature gas-cooled reactors (HTGR), and the coated particle fuel these reactors will use.”
Separately, on June 16, Bellevue, Wash.–based TerraPower announced that its Natrium reactor design has been formally submitted for U.K. regulatory review. The company also announced the formation of a new subsidiary, TerraPower UK Ltd.
Barry L. Butterfield (Retired), Daniel B. Bullen (DNFSB)
Proceedings | 16th International High-Level Radioactive Waste Management Conference (IHLRWM 2017) | Charlotte, NC, April 9-13, 2017 | Pages 330-335
An important component of the proposed Yucca Mountain Project was the development of a new rail line intended to transport waste casks from the main U.S. rail system to the repository site. The early phases of repository development identified five corridors for consideration: Carlin, Jean, Valley Modified, Caliente, and Caliente-Chalk Mountain. Later in the process, DOE added a new corridor, Mina, based on conversations with the Walker River Paiute Tribal Council. In the Final Environmental Impact Statement (RA-EIS) for the rail alignments, DOE concluded that two rail corridors, Caliente and Mina, would be considered in detail. Nevada Rail Partners, a subcontractor to the Yucca Mountain Project management and operations contractor, evaluated ten possible alternate alignments within the Caliente Corridor, and four alternate alignments within the Mina Corridor. The evaluations included alternative alignments (including rail design criteria), rail construction, yard facilities, and rail operations issues. This paper briefly describes these evaluations, and provides a summary of the engineering evaluation of facility requirements, system controls, construction planning, and air quality issues.
Development of conceptual design drawings for alternate alignments was relatively straightforward. The conceptual design process also included development of preliminary construction plans that provided a basis to the environmental contractor who prepared the RA-EIS. This paper focuses on the lessons learned throughout this conceptual design process as well as from a review of public comments received on the RA-EIS. These lessons address issues associated with general design principles, resource impacts, and alignment selection. This paper also provides a strategic assessment of issues regarding the new paradigm for environmental activism. These issues should be incorporated into the evaluation of any updated transportation plan for Yucca Mountain, should that site be re-considered, or any new site identified by either the Department of Energy or a private sector applicant.