ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Nuclear Nonproliferation Policy
The mission of the Nuclear Nonproliferation Policy Division (NNPD) is to promote the peaceful use of nuclear technology while simultaneously preventing the diversion and misuse of nuclear material and technology through appropriate safeguards and security, and promotion of nuclear nonproliferation policies. To achieve this mission, the objectives of the NNPD are to: Promote policy that discourages the proliferation of nuclear technology and material to inappropriate entities. Provide information to ANS members, the technical community at large, opinion leaders, and decision makers to improve their understanding of nuclear nonproliferation issues. Become a recognized technical resource on nuclear nonproliferation, safeguards, and security issues. Serve as the integration and coordination body for nuclear nonproliferation activities for the ANS. Work cooperatively with other ANS divisions to achieve these objective nonproliferation policies.
Meeting Spotlight
2025 ANS Annual Conference
June 15–18, 2025
Chicago, IL|Chicago Marriott Downtown
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Jun 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
July 2025
Nuclear Technology
June 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Former NRC commissioners lend support to efforts to eliminate mandatory hearings
A group of nine former nuclear regulatory commissioners sent a letter Wednesday to the current Nuclear Regulatory Commission members lending support to efforts to get rid of mandatory hearings in the licensing process, which should speed up the process by three to six months and save millions of dollars.
H. W. Bonin, J. R. Van Tine, V. T. Bui
Nuclear Technology | Volume 169 | Number 2 | February 2010 | Pages 150-179
Technical Paper | Radioactive Waste Management and Disposal | doi.org/10.13182/NT10-A9360
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
This work demonstrates the feasibility of fabricating containers for the ultimate disposal of spent nuclear reactor fuel and high-level radioactive waste using polymer-based composite materials. The study has identified three engineering polymers suitable for this demanding application: polyetheretherketone (PEEK), polyetherimide (PEI), and polysulfone (PSU). PEEK and PEI are used as composite materials components, with 30% carbon and glass fiber, respectively, whereas PSU is used as a virgin (nonreinforced) material. The rationale for the choice of polymer composites comes from their superior physical, mechanical, and chemical performance, in addition to their economical advantage. In particular, they display better resistance to corrosion and to structural weakening from irradiation.Scaled-down containers were fabricated using these materials. They were subjected to a battery of tests under conditions similar to those expected for the disposal environment of actual radioactive waste-filled containers. In particular, the container models were irradiated in the pool of a SLOWPOKE-2 nuclear research reactor, accumulating doses from a mixed-radiation field that were comparable to total doses accumulated over 500 yr at a deep underground waste repository site. Mechanical compression tests mimicked the large hydrostatic pressures incurred from granite rock at depths of some 1000 m within the Canadian Shield.Several composite materials were tested, and for the three engineering materials listed above, some of the results are as follows:1. variation in elastic modulus following a 28.9-kGy radiation dose - PEEK, -6.66% ± 0.47%; PEI, +5.63% ± 0.23%; PSU, +3.16% ± 0.13%2. compression results for the irradiated container models and load at break and strain - PEEK, 2.152 MPa and 1178 mm-1; PEI, 1.236 MPa and 1171 mm-1; PSU, 1.190 MPa and 2576 mm-1 , respectively3. cost analysis - costs for the fabrication of the prototype containers based on PEEK, $273610; PEI, $145920; PSU, $257460.The work also provided insight into potential problems in the fabrication of full-sized containers and into the best fabrication methods to adopt. The method of filament winding would be more appropriate for the PEEK- and the PEI-based composite materials, while blow forming would be the preferred method for the PSU material. In particular, this research could determine the best way to design the container lids.
