ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2025 ANS Winter Conference & Expo
November 8–12, 2025
Washington, DC|Washington Hilton
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Nov 2025
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
December 2025
Nuclear Technology
November 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
NRC finishes draft supplemental EIS for Clinch River SMR site
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers have completed a draft supplemental environmental impact statement for a small modular reactor at the Tennessee Valley Authority’s Clinch River nuclear site in Oak Ridge, Tenn.
Lei Jin, Hui He, Xutao Pei, Yu Zhou, Hongguo Hou, Meng Zhang, Shuai He, Yang Gao, Haitao Ma
Nuclear Technology | Volume 211 | Number 11 | November 2025 | Pages 2797-2811
Research Article | doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2025.2461426
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Because of the complex mechanisms in pulsed disk and doughnut columns (PDDCs), traditional empirical functions often fail to make accurate predictions in new datasets, such as different experimental conditions or different PDDC structures, indicating a lack of generalizability. In this work, some machine learning techniques such as random forest regression (RFR), least absolute shrinkage and selection operator, support vector regression (SVR), and artificial neural network are developed to predict dispersed phase holdup based on experimental data collected from numerous studies. Two training methods were used: One is to randomly divide the collected data into groups for training and testing, and the other is to separate the data of one study for testing and training in data from other studies. These methods were used to compare and analyze the accuracy, generalizability, and stability of these models, using the mean relative error (MRE) as the performance evaluation criterion. SVR has an MRE of 15.0% in the test set and 11.0% in the entire dataset, outperforming other alternative models in both efficiency and ability to mitigate overfitting. Furthermore, the relative importance of each parameter in influencing holdup was analyzed by RFR.