ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Feb 2026
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
March 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
January 2026
Latest News
ANS 2026 election is open
The 2026 American Nuclear Society election is now open. Members can vote for the Society’s next vice president/president-elect as well as six board members (five U.S. directors and one non-U.S. director). Completed ballots must be submitted by 12:00 p.m. (CDT) on Wednesday, April 1, 2026.
All ANS members have been emailed a unique access key from third-party election vendor ElectionBuddy. Each member can use their access key to vote once, and each vote will remain anonymous. Visit secure.electionbuddy.com/ballot to vote.
Hyun Seok Song, Jae Hak Cheong
Nuclear Technology | Volume 211 | Number 11 | November 2025 | Pages 2730-2747
Research Article | doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2024.2442832
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
This study expands and enhances an activation assessment framework based on MCNP6.2® and FISPACT-II.4.0 to systematically evaluate the impact of steel equipment on neutron activation within a positron emission tomography cyclotron vault. The neutron flux submodel was experimentally validated at a cyclotron facility in operation, and the assessment framework was applied to a reference cyclotron in Korea to analyze how steel equipment characteristics affect neutron activation. The results showed that the presence of steel equipment reduces the activation of concrete walls by up to 50%. However, the steel itself may become significantly activated, surpassing the clearance level and potentially generating new low-level radioactive waste. This is primarily due to the cobalt impurity concentration in steel being up to 100 times higher than in concrete. Furthermore, the presence of steel equipment could increase the total radioactive waste volume by 120% to 1600% depending on the duration of decay storage.
Based on these findings, it is recommended that steel equipment be located in a separate room outside the cyclotron vault to minimize activation and radioactive waste volume. For cases where the equipment must be housed within the vault, design provisions are proposed to reduce both equipment and concrete activation. These include (1) positioning steel equipment opposite the proton beam’s direction and as far as possible from the irradiated target and (2) considering cobalt-free nickel alloys to minimize activation. This study contributes valuable insights into optimizing cyclotron facility design and radioactive waste management to facilitate safe and efficient decommissioning.