ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
April 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Swiss nuclear power and the case for long-term operation
Designed for 40 years but built to last far longer, Switzerland’s nuclear power plants have all entered long-term operation. Yet age alone says little about safety or performance. Through continuous upgrades, strict regulatory oversight, and extensive aging management, the country’s reactors are being prepared for decades of continued operation, in line with international practice.
Joeun L. Kot, Theodore Thomas, Jason T. Harris
Nuclear Technology | Volume 211 | Number 3 | March 2025 | Pages 570-583
Research Article | doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2024.2343971
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Risk assessment involves analyzing potential accident scenarios to identify hazards and assess associated risk factors. Nuclear safety and security both aim to protect against radiation exposure, but they have developed separately with distinct risk assessment methodologies. As a result, there is a need for a comprehensive risk assessment method that covers both the safety and security aspects. The Potential Facility Risk Index (PFRI) was developed in 2020 to provide a quantitative approach to evaluating the security risk of nuclear facilities, but it does not consider safety risks.
This study aims to enhance the PFRI framework by incorporating probabilistic risk assessment methods to include safety risks. It assesses the risk of a hypothetical incident caused by adversaries at a hypothetical nuclear facility after a successful theft of nuclear material, followed by the construction and detonation of a radiological dispersal device. To achieve this goal, the study utilized event tree analysis and pathway analysis for loss event assessment and consequence analysis using the MELCOR accident consequence code systems for loss magnitude. New risk criteria were also established to determine the PFRI risk score.
Based on the results, the study found that the PFRI score for the hypothetical facility was 1, indicating that the risk level was negligible. Future studies incorporating other scenarios, such as sabotage and transportation, will help assess the total security risk of the facility. This method can also help facilitate the integration of risk assessments for nuclear safety and security.