ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Feb 2026
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
March 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
January 2026
Latest News
ANS 2026 election is open
The 2026 American Nuclear Society election is now open. Members can vote for the Society’s next vice president/president-elect as well as six board members (five U.S. directors and one non-U.S. director). Completed ballots must be submitted by 12:00 p.m. (CDT) on Wednesday, April 1, 2026.
All ANS members have been emailed a unique access key from third-party election vendor ElectionBuddy. Each member can use their access key to vote once, and each vote will remain anonymous. Visit secure.electionbuddy.com/ballot to vote.
Biao Zhang, Jinjia Cao, Shuang Lin, Yingming Song
Nuclear Technology | Volume 211 | Number 1 | January 2025 | Pages 1-12
Research Article | doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2024.2312026
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The inverse distance weighting (IDW) interpolation algorithm is used to reconstruct the γ radiation field. The traditional IDW interpolation algorithm is improved. The power exponent of distance P in the IDW for each interpolation point is not fixed and varies from one point to the other point. A fitting expression of P is obtained, which is a function of the coordinates of each point and can minimize the interpolation error when the number of sampling points is specified. Afterward, the improved algorithm is used to reconstruct a γ radiation field of a single source, and the theoretic results are compared with the results from Geant4, yielding an average relative error of 7.50%. The interpolated results from the experimental measurements align well with the actual data, with an average relative error of only 0.12%. The P derived from the interpolated experimental measurement data shows an error of 2.0% compared to the power exponent obtained from the Geant4 data interpolation. Then we set up a double-source γ radiation scene experiment and measured the count rate data at the grid points. At the same time, the experiment scene was simulated by Geant4. The improved IDW algorithm could not reconstruct the double-source γ radiation field well, thus further improvement is needed.