ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
March 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
April 2026
Latest News
NN Asks: What hurdles stand in the way of nuclear power’s global expansion?
Jake Jurewicz
Nuclear technology is mature. It provides firm power at scale with minimal externalities and has done so for decades. The core problem isn’t about the technology—it is how the plants are built. Nuclear construction has a well-documented history of cost and schedule overruns. Previous nuclear plants often spent more than twice what was first budgeted, making nuclear among the power technologies with the largest average cost overruns worldwide.
Recent projects illustrate how severe the problem can be. In South Carolina, the V.C. Summer nuclear expansion saw projected costs rise from roughly $10 billion to more than $25 billion before the project was abandoned in 2017, by which time more than $9 billion had already been spent and customers were stuck paying for a site they have yet to benefit from.
Yong Wang, Lichuang Liang, Jun Tian, Dongchuan Su, Hui Li, Naibin Jiang
Nuclear Technology | Volume 210 | Number 11 | November 2024 | Pages 2115-2132
Research Article | doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2024.2310902
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The heat pipe reactor represents a promising high-temperature microreactor design comprising heat pipes, fuel rods, and monoliths. Prolonged operation at elevated temperatures leads to an obvious thermal creep and thermal stress within the monolith. The monolith may have structural failure due to creep damage and fatigue damage caused by temperature fatigue load. This paper presents an analysis of the creep fatigue damage in the monolith of the MegaPower heat pipe reactor using the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code Section III, Division 5 (BPVC Sec. III, Div. 5) inelastic design-by-analysis rules.
The research findings demonstrate pronounced stress relaxation in the monolith caused by thermal creep, resulting in a redistribution of thermal stress. The region experiencing peak thermal stress within the monolith transitions from the thinnest web between the fuel rods to the edge of the monolith after 50 000 h of operation at full power. Thermal creep results in a 40.5% decrease in peak thermal stress and a 0.023% increase in the displacement amplitude of the monolith. The creep fatigue damage in the monolith at full power for 50 cycles, each lasting 1000 h, adheres to the design rule limitation of the ASME BPVC. The damage is primarily concentrated in the thinnest web region at the edge of the monolith, predominantly attributed to creep damage. The creep fatigue damage check in the monolith should carefully consider the effect of stress relaxation.