ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Reactor Physics
The division's objectives are to promote the advancement of knowledge and understanding of the fundamental physical phenomena characterizing nuclear reactors and other nuclear systems. The division encourages research and disseminates information through meetings and publications. Areas of technical interest include nuclear data, particle interactions and transport, reactor and nuclear systems analysis, methods, design, validation and operating experience and standards. The Wigner Award heads the awards program.
Meeting Spotlight
2025 ANS Annual Conference
June 15–18, 2025
Chicago, IL|Chicago Marriott Downtown
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Jun 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
July 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Smarter waste strategies: Helping deliver on the promise of advanced nuclear
At COP28, held in Dubai in 2023, a clear consensus emerged: Nuclear energy must be a cornerstone of the global clean energy transition. With electricity demand projected to soar as we decarbonize not just power but also industry, transport, and heat, the case for new nuclear is compelling. More than 20 countries committed to tripling global nuclear capacity by 2050. In the United States alone, the Department of Energy forecasts that the country’s current nuclear capacity could more than triple, adding 200 GW of new nuclear to the existing 95 GW by mid-century.
Javiera Cervini-Silva
Nuclear Technology | Volume 210 | Number 8 | August 2024 | Pages 1487-1495
Note | doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2023.2295152
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Bentonites are natural reservoirs of various elements and are of interest because they are sources of thorium and uranium, which are transition elements that provide nuclear energy. The objective of this work was to study the plausible association(s) of these elements with other transition elements of interest. The contents of 18 transition elements (cerium, cobalt, chromium, copper, iron, hafnium, lanthanum, manganese, molybdenum, neodymium niobium, nickel, tantalum, thorium, uranium, vanadium, yttrium, zinc, and zirconium) in 38 bentonites determined experimentally by X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy (XRF) were analyzed.
The contents of the elements were plotted in (x,y) graphs and then fitted to polynomial functions (orders 1 through 6). According to the coefficient of determination (r2: 0.5 ≤ r2 strong, 0.3 ≤ r2 ≤ 0.5 medium, and r2 ≤ 0.3 weak), the contents of thorium, uranium, niobium, and nickel related strongly, thus the presence of niobium and nickel served to predict the presence of detectable concentrations of thorium and uranium. The equations showing higher r2 values were
1. {Th} = 1e-6{Nb}5 − 3e-4{Nb}4 + 1.9e-2{Nb}3 − 5.4e-1{Nb}2 + 7.3{Nb} − 6.3, r2 = 0.53.
2. {Th} = −3e-8{Nb}6 + 9e-6{Nb}5 − 1e-3{Nb}4 + 4.7e-2{Nb}3 − 1.1{Nb}2 + 11.5{Nb} − 16, r2 = 0.54.
3. {Th} = 5e-6{Ni}4 − 1.5e-3{Ni}3 − 1.5e-1{Ni}2 − 5.8{Ni} + 9e+1, r2 = 0.49.
4. {Th} = −7e-8{Ni}5 + 3e-5{Ni}4 − 5.1e-3{Ni}3 + 3.4e-1{Ni}2 − 9.5{Nb} + 1e+2, r2 = 0.56.
5. {Th} = 2e-9{Ni}6 − 8e-7{Ni}5 + 2e-4{Ni}4 − 1.5e-2{Ni}3 − 7e-1{Ni}2 − 1e+1{Ni} + 1e+1, r2 = 0.60.
6. {Th} = −1e-4{U}5 + 1.3e-2{U}4 − 4.3e-1{U}3 + 5.7e-1{U}2 − 2e+1{U} + 5e+1, r2 = 0.54.
7. {Th} = 6e-6{U}6 − 9e-4{U}5 + 4.5e-2{U}4 − 1.1{U}3 + 1e+1{U}2 − 5e+1{U} + 1e+2, r2 = 0.64.
8. {U} = 8e-6{Nb}4 − 1.2e-3{Nb}3 + 4.8e-2{Nb}2 − 4.3e-1{Nb} + 6.8, r2 = 0.48.
9. {U} = 2e-7{Nb}5 − 4e-5{Nb}4 + 2.8e-3{Nb}3 − 7.6e-2{Nb}2 + 1.1{Nb} + 1.9, r2 = 0.5.
10. {U} = 1e-8{Nb}6 − 3e-6{Nb}5 + 2e-4{Nb}4 − 8e-3{Nb}3 + 1.3e-1{Nb}2 − 5.4e-1{Nb} + 5.4, r2 = 0.51.
11. {U} = 1.8e-1{Th} + 2.6, r2 = 0.49; {U} = 1.7e-3{Th}2 − 2.9e-2{Th} + 6.3, r2 = 0.60.
12. {U} = 2e-5{Th}3 − 1.7e-3{Th}2 + 1.4e-1{Th} + 4.5, r2 = 0.58; {U} = −5e-7{Th}4 + 2e-4{Th}3 − 1.5e-2{Th}2 + 5.5e-1{Th} + 1.5, r2 = 0.6.
13. {U} = −7e-9{Th}5 + 2e-6{Th}4 − 1e-4{Th}3 − 3e-4{Th}2 + 2.7e-1{Th} + 2.9, r2 = 0.6.
14. {U} = 2e-9{Th}6 − 8e-7{Th}5 + 1e-4{Th}4 − 8.1e-3{Th}3 − 2.4e-1{Th}2 + 15, r2 = 0.65.
This study provided a joint experimental and theoretical approach to optimize the recovery of thorium and uranium and to save invaluable onsite and off-site natural resources and work time. The findings might expand on other studies reporting the quantification of transition metals on bentonite matrices. For instance, the concentrations of nickel reported in studies using bench techniques could serve as the basis to calculate the contents of thorium.
