ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
March 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
April 2026
Latest News
NN Asks: What hurdles stand in the way of nuclear power’s global expansion?
Jake Jurewicz
Nuclear technology is mature. It provides firm power at scale with minimal externalities and has done so for decades. The core problem isn’t about the technology—it is how the plants are built. Nuclear construction has a well-documented history of cost and schedule overruns. Previous nuclear plants often spent more than twice what was first budgeted, making nuclear among the power technologies with the largest average cost overruns worldwide.
Recent projects illustrate how severe the problem can be. In South Carolina, the V.C. Summer nuclear expansion saw projected costs rise from roughly $10 billion to more than $25 billion before the project was abandoned in 2017, by which time more than $9 billion had already been spent and customers were stuck paying for a site they have yet to benefit from.
Ben Lindley
Nuclear Technology | Volume 210 | Number 8 | August 2024 | Pages 1319-1335
Research Article | doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2023.2295164
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Increasing the number of pins within a pressurized water reactor (PWR) assembly reduces pin temperature for a given assembly power. In conjunction with a core retrofit, this presents a potential route to PWR uprate, which is of growing interest given recent increases in electricity prices. However, most PWRs utilize regular lattice designs with fixed guide tube positions, such as the very common 17 × 17 lattice design with 25 guide/instrumentation tubes. These tubes are aligned with penetrations in the reactor pressure vessel, which presents a prohibitive obstacle to retrofit, and more widely, may “lock” many PWRs to this particular fuel configuration.
In this paper, an irregular PWR fuel assembly is proposed. It is shown that a backward-compatible lattice with 324 fuel pins per assembly (BL324), uniform enrichment, and the same hydrogen-to–heavy metal ratio as a reference 17 × 17 assembly with 264 fuel pins can achieve within-assembly power peaking within 2% of the reference assembly under equivalent conditions while fixing the guide tube positions. Power peaking can be further reduced to reach that of the existing fuel assembly by reducing the enrichment of 36 of the pins by 0.2 wt%.
The fuel assembly could potentially either support a significant uprate of up to ~20% in conjunction with low-enriched uranium plus (LEU+) fuel or a more aggressive cycle design, and hence, improved discharge burnup at the same power and batch strategy. A subchannel analysis shows that the coolant heat-up distribution is comparable to the reference assembly. However, the pressure drop is estimated to be 4% higher, which would challenge the performance of transition cores containing both 17 × 17s and BL324s. Further incremental changes to BL324 may be attractive, either to improve manufacturability or to slightly improve performance through formal optimization.