ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
October 2026
Nuclear Technology
September 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2026
Latest News
Porous tungsten scrubbed by glow discharge cleaning
Researchers conducted experiments in Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory’s Lithium Tokamak Experiment-Beta (LTX-β) showing glow discharge cleaning can be used to effectively clean samples of porous tungsten—used to hold liquid lithium in fusion machine inner walls—manufactured from powder-reconstituted materials, according to a paper published in Nuclear Materials and Energy.
Tungsten is widely used for plasma-facing components in fusion machines, especially in the divertor region where materials must withstand extreme levels of power flow. According to the paper, spark plasma sintering can be used to make tungsten into spongelike samples for holding liquid lithium.
David Reger, Elia Merzari, Paolo Balestra, Sebastian Schunert, Yassin Hassan, Stephen King
Nuclear Technology | Volume 210 | Number 7 | July 2024 | Pages 1258-1278
Research Article | doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2023.2218245
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
An in-depth understanding of the flow physics in packed beds is critical for developing simulation tools for pebble bed reactors. Advances in computing power have now made the full-core pebble-resolved computational fluid dynamics simulation of these systems possible. This work presents validation of the velocity and pressure predictions made by the spectral element code NekRS followed by a study of the turbulent kinetic energy and turbulent heat flux budgets. Two cases with corresponding experiments are considered: a bed of 67 pebbles with Re = 1460 and a bed of 789 pebbles with 324 < Re < 1024. Velocity and pressure drop comparisons are performed with the two cases, respectively. Good agreement is found between the experiments and their respective NekRS simulations.
The 67-pebble case was then used to perform a direct numerical simulation to extract the turbulent kinetic energy and turbulent heat flux budget terms. Analysis of the turbulent kinetic energy production revealed large areas of negative production near the bottom surfaces of the pebbles. Further investigation revealed a trend between the average amount of negative turbulent kinetic energy production and the local porosity. These results continue to suggest that inertial effects play a large role in differentiating near-wall flow from bed-interior flow.