ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
March 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
April 2026
Latest News
NN Asks: What hurdles stand in the way of nuclear power’s global expansion?
Jake Jurewicz
Nuclear technology is mature. It provides firm power at scale with minimal externalities and has done so for decades. The core problem isn’t about the technology—it is how the plants are built. Nuclear construction has a well-documented history of cost and schedule overruns. Previous nuclear plants often spent more than twice what was first budgeted, making nuclear among the power technologies with the largest average cost overruns worldwide.
Recent projects illustrate how severe the problem can be. In South Carolina, the V.C. Summer nuclear expansion saw projected costs rise from roughly $10 billion to more than $25 billion before the project was abandoned in 2017, by which time more than $9 billion had already been spent and customers were stuck paying for a site they have yet to benefit from.
David Reger, Elia Merzari, Paolo Balestra, Sebastian Schunert, Yassin Hassan, Stephen King
Nuclear Technology | Volume 210 | Number 7 | July 2024 | Pages 1258-1278
Research Article | doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2023.2218245
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
An in-depth understanding of the flow physics in packed beds is critical for developing simulation tools for pebble bed reactors. Advances in computing power have now made the full-core pebble-resolved computational fluid dynamics simulation of these systems possible. This work presents validation of the velocity and pressure predictions made by the spectral element code NekRS followed by a study of the turbulent kinetic energy and turbulent heat flux budgets. Two cases with corresponding experiments are considered: a bed of 67 pebbles with Re = 1460 and a bed of 789 pebbles with 324 < Re < 1024. Velocity and pressure drop comparisons are performed with the two cases, respectively. Good agreement is found between the experiments and their respective NekRS simulations.
The 67-pebble case was then used to perform a direct numerical simulation to extract the turbulent kinetic energy and turbulent heat flux budget terms. Analysis of the turbulent kinetic energy production revealed large areas of negative production near the bottom surfaces of the pebbles. Further investigation revealed a trend between the average amount of negative turbulent kinetic energy production and the local porosity. These results continue to suggest that inertial effects play a large role in differentiating near-wall flow from bed-interior flow.