ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
March 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
April 2026
Latest News
NN Asks: What hurdles stand in the way of nuclear power’s global expansion?
Jake Jurewicz
Nuclear technology is mature. It provides firm power at scale with minimal externalities and has done so for decades. The core problem isn’t about the technology—it is how the plants are built. Nuclear construction has a well-documented history of cost and schedule overruns. Previous nuclear plants often spent more than twice what was first budgeted, making nuclear among the power technologies with the largest average cost overruns worldwide.
Recent projects illustrate how severe the problem can be. In South Carolina, the V.C. Summer nuclear expansion saw projected costs rise from roughly $10 billion to more than $25 billion before the project was abandoned in 2017, by which time more than $9 billion had already been spent and customers were stuck paying for a site they have yet to benefit from.
Cristiano Ciurluini, Vincenzo Narcisi, Ivan Di Piazza, Fabio Giannetti
Nuclear Technology | Volume 210 | Number 4 | April 2024 | Pages 713-724
Research Article | doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2023.2222248
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A computational campaign was carried out at the Department of Astronautical, Electrical and Energy Engineering of Sapienza University of Rome aiming at the assessment of RELAP5-3D© capabilities for subchannel analysis. More specifically, the investigation involved a lead-bismuth-eutectic–cooled wire-spaced fuel pin bundle and compared simulation outcomes with experimental data coming from the NAtural CIrculation Experiment-Upgraded (NACIE-UP) facility, hosted at ENEA Brasimone Research Center. Thermal-hydraulic nodalization of the facility was developed with detailed subchannel modeling of the fuel pin simulator (FPS). Three different methodologies for the subchannel simulation were investigated, increasing step by step the complexity of the thermal-hydraulic model. In the simplest approach, the subchannels were modeled one by one. In addition, mass transfer between them was considered thanks to multiple cross junction components, realizing the hydraulic connection between adjacent subchannels. In this case, mass transfer depends on the pressure gradient and hydraulic resistance only, ignoring the turbulent mixing promoted by the wire-wrapped subassembly. Simulation results were not satisfactory, and an improvement was introduced in the second approach. In this case, several control variables calculate at each time step the energy transfer between adjacent control volumes associated with the turbulent mixing induced by the wires. This energy is transferred using ad hoc heat structures (HSs), where the boundary conditions are calculated by the control variables. The present model highlighted good capabilities in the prediction of the radial temperature distribution within the FPS, considerably reducing disagreement with experimental data. Finally, the influence of radial conduction within the fluid domain was assessed, introducing further HSs. Although this most complex model provided the best estimation of the experimental acquisition, the improvements given by radial conduction were not so relevant to justify the correspondent increase of the computational cost.