ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
March 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
April 2026
Latest News
NN Asks: What hurdles stand in the way of nuclear power’s global expansion?
Jake Jurewicz
Nuclear technology is mature. It provides firm power at scale with minimal externalities and has done so for decades. The core problem isn’t about the technology—it is how the plants are built. Nuclear construction has a well-documented history of cost and schedule overruns. Previous nuclear plants often spent more than twice what was first budgeted, making nuclear among the power technologies with the largest average cost overruns worldwide.
Recent projects illustrate how severe the problem can be. In South Carolina, the V.C. Summer nuclear expansion saw projected costs rise from roughly $10 billion to more than $25 billion before the project was abandoned in 2017, by which time more than $9 billion had already been spent and customers were stuck paying for a site they have yet to benefit from.
Federico Hattab, Fabio Giannetti, Vincenzo Narcisi, Pierdomenico Lorusso, Filippo Bussoletti, Michael Epstein, Sung Jin Lee, Mariano Tarantino
Nuclear Technology | Volume 210 | Number 4 | April 2024 | Pages 543-564
Research Article | doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2023.2173482
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
This paper presents an assessment aimed at evaluating primary heat exchanger (PHE) failure of the Westinghouse Electric Company Lead-cooled Fast Reactor (LFR) and at designing a facility for testing phenomena involved in such failure. The system thermal-hydraulic code RELAP5/MOD3.3 was used to develop a transient analysis simulation at reactor scale. Because of RELAP5/MOD3.3’s inability to mix working fluids, the steam injection effect was evaluated using the SIMMER-III code. The limits and strengths of both codes are highlighted throughout the paper. The reactor-scale steady-state results are in good agreement with the nominal operating condition. The transient results show that lead pool surface level variation and primary system pressurization during the PHE failure event are limited.
The PHE failure testing facility was characterized, and a preliminary layout was developed. A separate-effects transient inside the vessel was analyzed with SIMMER-III and RELAP5/MOD3.3 runs. The simulation outcomes have provided useful data to inform subsequent design stages for the test facility. Different configurations of the facility have been assessed, highlighting the strengths and weaknesses of each design. The most important issue was identified to be lead pool swelling, reaching the vessel’s lid and blocking the pressure relief vent. This poses a safety hazard that must be addressed and has been raised for resolution in subsequent design stages. The so-called V4 configuration is suggested as a starting point for further improvement of the facility. Furthermore, a smaller failure opening and lower lead level in the vessel are suggested.