ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2026
Nuclear Technology
August 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
SuperCritical Materials licenses technology for uranium seawater extraction
Last week, Austin, Texas–based nuclear fuel start-up SuperCritical Materials announced that it has secured a license from the Department of Energy for a patented uranium and critical materials adsorbent manufacturing process originally developed by a team led by Pacific Northwest National Laboratory.
SuperCritical aims to use this license to extract uranium from seawater at an industrial scale in the United States and abroad.
Kenta Inagaki
Nuclear Technology | Volume 210 | Number 2 | February 2024 | Pages 308-323
Research Article | doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2023.2239041
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
This paper presents simulation results of earlier fuel melting tests (xM3 and HBC4) performed under the power-to-melt-and-maneuverability (P2M) simulation exercise organized within the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)/Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA) framework for irradiation experiments. The simulations were performed using the single-rod performance analysis code FRAPCON/FRAPTRAN as a contribution of the Central Research Institute of Electric Power Industry (CRIEPI) to the P2M simulation exercise. To this end, the base irradiation of each sample was simulated using FRAPCON software, and the calculated result was used to define the initial state of the transient simulations; the xM3 and HBC4 ramp tests were simulated using FRAPTRAN. Fuel melting was not predicted for xM3, and the melting radius was underestimated for HBC4 using the original version of FRAPTRAN. The value of the fuel/cladding gap conductance was modified to obtain results that satisfy the experimental measurement of the melting radius.
In this paper, the simulation results are compared with experimental results, and the causes for discrepancy between the simulation and experiment results are discussed. The necessary improvements for FRAPTRAN to achieve a better simulation of fuel melting are also discussed. These results can help calibrate codes against high-temperature behavior and improve fuel melting modeling toward the planned P2M power ramp tests.