ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Feb 2026
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
March 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
January 2026
Latest News
INL researchers use LEDs to shed light on next-gen reactors
At Idaho National Laboratory, researchers have built a bridge between computer models and the lab’s Microreactor Applications Research Validation and Evaluation (MARVEL) microreactor.
Tony Crawford, an INL researcher and MARVEL’s reactivity control system lead, designed a phone booth–sized surrogate nuclear reactor called ViBRANT, or Visual Benign Reactor as Analog for Nuclear Testing, which uses light instead of neutrons to show a “nuclear” reaction.
Hossein Hashemi-Jozani, Khalil Moshkbar-Bakhshayesh, Soroush Mohtashami, Behzad Rokhbin
Nuclear Technology | Volume 210 | Number 1 | January 2024 | Pages 180-188
Note | doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2023.2224131
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The computerized simulation of the reactor core is one of the significant steps necessary for designing a nuclear power plant. So far, very suitable Monte Carlo–based codes have been developed (e.g., MCNP, TRIPOLI, KENO, OpenMC, etc.) for the neutronic simulation of the reactor core. In this study, an approach based on Geant4, as an extendable code with the capability to provide a comprehensive reactor core design tool, is developed to calculate the effective multiplication factor (keff) and neutron flux distribution. A combination of the Geant4 code and the NJOY code is applied to calculate the temperature-dependent cross-section library. The C5G7-1D, the Godiva critical facility, and the Jordan subcritical reactor are examined as a benchmarks/case study. The results of the calculation of keff (i.e., relative error < 0.1%) and flux distribution (i.e., relative error <3%) are in very good agreement with the calculation results of the MCNP code and the experimental results. The extensions for the calculation of thermodynamic/thermohydraulic effects as well as the calculation of electron/photon transport and reactor dynamics are under development and will be reported as subsequent results.