ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
March 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
April 2026
Latest News
NN Asks: What hurdles stand in the way of nuclear power’s global expansion?
Jake Jurewicz
Nuclear technology is mature. It provides firm power at scale with minimal externalities and has done so for decades. The core problem isn’t about the technology—it is how the plants are built. Nuclear construction has a well-documented history of cost and schedule overruns. Previous nuclear plants often spent more than twice what was first budgeted, making nuclear among the power technologies with the largest average cost overruns worldwide.
Recent projects illustrate how severe the problem can be. In South Carolina, the V.C. Summer nuclear expansion saw projected costs rise from roughly $10 billion to more than $25 billion before the project was abandoned in 2017, by which time more than $9 billion had already been spent and customers were stuck paying for a site they have yet to benefit from.
Yoshiharu Sakamura
Nuclear Technology | Volume 210 | Number 1 | January 2024 | Pages 147-164
Research Article | doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2023.2216974
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The electrorefining of spent metallic fuels is conducted in LiCl–KCl eutectic–based salt to recycle U, Pu, and minor actinides when chemically active fission products of rare earth, alkali, and alkaline-earth metals accumulate in the salt. For removing the fission products from the salt, a batchwise multistage countercurrent extraction technique using a liquid Cd solvent and a Li reductant was investigated and found to achieve both a high recovery ratio of actinides and a sufficient degree of separation from rare earths.
Vessels containing salt were prepared in accordance with the number of stages, and a smaller vessel containing liquid Cd was immersed in them sequentially to extract actinides from the salt. This operation is simple and reliable. The results calculated using the equilibrium separation factors reported in the literature suggested that four-stage extraction offers satisfactory performance for the separation of actinides from rare earths: more than 80% of Nd remained in the salt when 99.9% of Pu was recovered.
Moreover, demonstration tests were conducted using Nd and Dy as surrogates of actinides and rare earths, respectively. The separation factor between Dy and Nd was determined to be 21, which was approximately equal to that between Nd and Pu reported in the literature. It was shown that the experimental results of extracting Nd while leaving Dy in the salt were in good agreement with the calculated results. In conclusion, batchwise multistage countercurrent extraction was proved to be a promising actinide separation method.