ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
August 2026
Nuclear Technology
July 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
The deadline arrives: Checking in on the Reactor Pilot Program
On May 23, 2025, President Trump signed Executive Order 14301, “Reforming Nuclear Reactor Testing at the DOE,” which instructed the Department of Energy to create a Reactor Pilot Program (RPP)—a new system in which companies could pursue DOE authorization to build and test their first-of-a-kind nuclear technologies. EO 14301 set an ambitious goal for that program: three reactors achieving criticality by July 4, 2026.
P. D. Vaswani, P. K. Tamboli, Debraj Chakraborty
Nuclear Technology | Volume 210 | Number 1 | January 2024 | Pages 126-136
Research Article | doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2023.2214662
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
This paper considers an optimized full state feedback (FSF) optimal controller for bulk power control of a 700-MW(electric) pressurized heavy water reactor (PHWR) that minimizes the controller norm to reduce the effect of disturbances. Lyapunov’s linear matrix inequalities (LMIs) have been considered for stability of the model. For the closed loop, these inequalities, which become nonlinear in the unknowns, are converted to LMIs by a suitable variable substitution. The controller’s optimization is achieved by minimizing the upper bound of the state feedback vector’s norm. As a result of this optimization, the controller gain is reduced, which reduces the effect of the disturbance input to the system. We study the stability of the closed loop system and the nonlinear transient performance using the state feedback. We demonstrate that the proposed controller’s transient performance is superior to that of a nonoptimized controller when compared to a conventional proportional-derivative controller. The designed controller has a norm that is about five orders lower than that obtained without optimization while still providing acceptable transient performance.