ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
March 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
April 2026
Latest News
NN Asks: What hurdles stand in the way of nuclear power’s global expansion?
Jake Jurewicz
Nuclear technology is mature. It provides firm power at scale with minimal externalities and has done so for decades. The core problem isn’t about the technology—it is how the plants are built. Nuclear construction has a well-documented history of cost and schedule overruns. Previous nuclear plants often spent more than twice what was first budgeted, making nuclear among the power technologies with the largest average cost overruns worldwide.
Recent projects illustrate how severe the problem can be. In South Carolina, the V.C. Summer nuclear expansion saw projected costs rise from roughly $10 billion to more than $25 billion before the project was abandoned in 2017, by which time more than $9 billion had already been spent and customers were stuck paying for a site they have yet to benefit from.
Una Baker, Marisol Garrouste, Sooyoung Choi, Gabriel J. Soto, Ross Snuggerud, Brendan Kochunas, Ben Lindley
Nuclear Technology | Volume 210 | Number 1 | January 2024 | Pages 1-22
Research Article | doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2023.2216973
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The NuScale small modular reactor (SMR) has been modeled using the Virtual Environment for Reactor Applications multiphysics environment and the results compared with the publicly reported data in the Design Certification Application. The results show an excellent agreement for the compared axial and radial power distributions, temperature coefficients of reactivity, boron and control rod worths, and fast neutron flux. This NuScale model is then used to investigate the effect of different operational modes on reactor components to determine how the flexible load-following operation may affect control rod and reactor pressure vessel (RPV) lifetimes. The control rod degradation is confirmed to primarily affect the silver-indium-cadmium rod tip. The degradation rate is observed to follow a nonlinear function of core power level where the increase in degradation decreases with insertion depth.
For the variation in core power levels expected with current load-following schemes, the total control rod degradation is found to be mild, at 5% to 10% of usable life per cycle for a reactor operating at <80% power. Nonetheless, this enables load-following strategies to be confirmed and/or modified to ensure that control rods do not need to be replaced during the 60+ year life of the reactor. The RPV degradation was found to be almost directly proportional to the core power level and was not overly sensitive to flux shape perturbations. Future work is planned using these damage functions to optimize operation over multiple NuScale SMR units and to develop strategies for prognostics and health management.