ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Nuclear Criticality Safety
NCSD provides communication among nuclear criticality safety professionals through the development of standards, the evolution of training methods and materials, the presentation of technical data and procedures, and the creation of specialty publications. In these ways, the division furthers the exchange of technical information on nuclear criticality safety with the ultimate goal of promoting the safe handling of fissionable materials outside reactors.
Meeting Spotlight
2024 ANS Winter Conference and Expo
November 17–21, 2024
Orlando, FL|Renaissance Orlando at SeaWorld
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Nov 2024
Jul 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
December 2024
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
November 2024
Latest News
Fighting fatigue and maintaining 10 CFR Part 26 compliance
Fatigue has been identified as a major risk factor in industrial accidents. According to the National Safety Council, 13 percent of workplace injuries can be attributed to fatigue.1 Other research indicates that working 12 hours per day is associated with a staggering 37 percent increase in risk of injury.2 Considering fatigue was a contributing factor to major nuclear accidents at Chernobyl and Three Mile Island, it makes sense that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission imposes hefty fines to ensure strict adherence to its fatigue management regulations—particularly, Code of Federal Regulations Title 10, Part 26, “Fitness for Duty Programs.”
Hyun-Sik Park, Hwang Bae, Sung-Uk Ryu, Byong-Guk Jeon, Jin-Hwa Yang, Sung-Jae Yi, Young-Jong Chung
Nuclear Technology | Volume 209 | Number 10 | October 2023 | Pages 1617-1635
Note | doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2023.2217370
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The thermal-hydraulic research supporting the development of an integral type of reactor named System-integrated Modular Advanced ReacTor (SMART) is discussed. First, the SMART development program is introduced. The Standard Design Approval (SDA) for SMART was certificated in 2012 based on extensive technical validation activities during 2009 to 2012, and a set of passive safety systems (PSSs) was designed and validated for SMART during 2013 to 2015 after the Fukushima Daiichi accident. During 2016 to 2018, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and Korea conducted a 3-year project of Pre-Project Engineering (PPE), and now, the Standard Design Approval (SDA) for SMART100 is being processed from 2019. Second, the SMART validation test program and related test facilities are introduced. A set of integral effect tests (IETs) was performed using VISTA-ITL, and several separate effect tests (SETs) using the facilities of SWAT, SCOP, and FTHEL were performed for SMART SDA. Counterpart tests for SMART SDA were performed with the newly constructed SMART-ITL facility, and various validation tests for SMART PSSs were also performed. In addition, dozens of validation tests for SMART PPE were performed to produce IET data for design-basis-accident scenarios and PSSs. Additional SETs for SMART PPE and SMART100 SDA were performed using the facilities of SISTA-1, SISTA-2, and FINCLS. Third, the major test results are discussed for phenomena expected to occur in an integral type of reactor such as the SMART design. They include core cooling behaviors in the reactor coolant system and safety injection behaviors in the passive safety injection system and counterpart test results of a small-break loss-of-coolant accident between VISTA-ITL and SMART-ITL. Fourth, the major analysis results for SMART are discussed. Several sets of code analysis were performed for selected IET cases with the MARS-KS and TASS/SMR-S codes to validate their models and the codes themselves. They include simulation of a SMART safety injection system line break test with the MARS-KS code, validation of the TASS/SMR-S code for natural circulation tests, and validation of the MARS-KS and TASS/SMR-S codes based on a pressurizer safety valve line break test.