ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Feb 2026
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
February 2026
Nuclear Technology
January 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
LLNL offers tools to model the economics of inertial fusion power plants
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory has designed a model to help assess the economic impact of future fusion power plant operations—specifically, the operation of inertial fusion energy (IFE) power plants. Further, it has made its Generalized Economics Model (GEM) for Fusion Technology—an Excel spreadsheet—available for download.
Amanda D. E. Foley, Swomitra K. Mohanty, Glenn E. Sjoden
Nuclear Technology | Volume 209 | Number 2 | February 2023 | Pages 228-243
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2022.2131972
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Cadmium zinc telluride (CZT) spectrometers have been considered for objectives and missions with variable ambient temperatures. Spectrometer-grade crystals of various sizes have been studied under conditions as low as −40°C for 2 × 2 × 2 and 5 × 5 × 2-mm3 crystals, and −10°C for 5 × 5 × 5-mm3 crystals for resolution improvement spanning 5.9-, 59.5-, and 122-keV photo peak energies. It is unclear from previously published data if cooling the spectrometer-grade crystals beyond −10°C results in increased resolution improvement or if the effect occurs with higher-energy photo peaks and trends among multiple crystals from the same manufacturer. Therefore, we acquired two CZT crystals from Kromek and cooled them in an insulated box to −25°C. Our measurements were performed every 5°C, and tested with 241Am or 241Am/152Eu mixed sources. The 241Am peaks were compared for both crystals, and the higher-energy resolution changes were explored using the mixed source.
Overall, at 59.5 keV, both crystals yielded 3% to 4% resolution improvement for the cooling cycle and 6% improvement during the warming cycle. Resolution performance varied between the two tested crystals, and each had a different temperature where we observed optimum resolution. The 121.8-keV peak resolution improved by 1.2% for the cooling cycle and 3.6% for the warming cycle. There were no discernable resolution increases or changes for the two higher-energy peaks, 224.7 and 334.3 keV, respectively. Slight cooling of the CZT crystals can increase resolution performance by 4% in the lower-energy region.