ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
October 2026
Nuclear Technology
September 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2026
Latest News
Center for Used Fuel Research: Building confidence in storage and transport
Used nuclear fuel storage and transportation have reached a critical juncture.
Dozens of utilities need reliable data on how used nuclear fuel performs in dry storage casks and canisters to extend regulatory licenses at sites across the United States. Likewise, the Department of Energy expects to take ownership of the used nuclear fuel—termed “spent nuclear fuel” in the laws and regulations governing its stewardship—and transfer it to one or more federal staging facilities for management and disposition.
Meanwhile, dozens of reactor companies are testing prototypes of advanced reactors and advanced reactor fuels. Eventually, regulators and industry must also verify the safety and security of storage methods for these advanced fuel types.
To help address these challenges, the DOE established the Center for Used Fuel Research (CUFR) in January 2026 for work related to the long-term storage and transport of used nuclear fuel.
Po-Jung Chiu, Chung-Kung Lo, Tai-Hung Wu
Nuclear Technology | Volume 209 | Number 1 | January 2023 | Pages 53-68
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2022.2105633
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
We discuss the specific risk significance in the extended pre-defueled (PD) phase of the decommissioning process, particularly if spent fuels are still in the core due to the low-power and shutdown refueling plant operating state (POS). The issue of full-core discharge capability after permanent shutdown during the PD phase motivated this study on the evolution of system risks using a reference plant design of the two-unit/BWR-4/Mark-I.
The effects of the reactor core and the spent fuel pool (SFP) on the incorporative risks are explored. The probabilistic risk assessment methodology, including the technical elements, is systematically developed by defining two primary configurations from the internal event analysis under the models 30, 60, 180, 365, and 942 days after permanent shutdown, respectively. The movable refueling gate between the reactor core and the SFP, as well as the residual heat removal (RHR) system, have been subjected to two sensitivity studies on system configurations in order to examine the induced impacts by the refueling gate and cooling systems. MELCOR, a realistic thermal-hydraulic code, is utilized to determine the decay heat levels and the success criteria after shutdown. The two operator tasks are assumed to be independent in the situation of decreasing decay heat after shutdown and a long time available for human actions.
In addition, the WinNUPRA software package is used for the fuel uncovery sequence quantification. Plant-centered loss-of-offsite power (LOOP), flow diversion loss-of-coolant accidents (LOCAs) to the suppression pool via the RHR system, switchyard-centered LOOPs, and LOCAs in the connected systems via the RHR, have proven to be the most significant initiating events for the configurations. When compared to the low-power and shutdown refueling POS, the realistic quantification results in terms of fuel uncovery frequencies and the evolution of the risk profile for the basic and sensitivity configurations meet the expectations under the PD-phase condition of low-decay heat levels.
