ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
April 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
RIC panel discusses pathway to fusion commercialization
Fusion leaders at the Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s annual Regulatory Information Conference discussed the path forward for regulating the burgeoning fusion industry. The speakers discussed government and private industry initiatives in the United States and United Kingdom, with a focus on efforts shaping the near-term deployment of commercial fusion machines.
A recurring theme was the need to explain the difference between fission and fusion. Representatives from the Department of Energy and Type One Energy highlighted this as an important distinction for regulators, as it will allow fusion to undergo its own independent maturation process for developing standards and regulations in the same way that fission has. Lea Perlas, Fusion Program director at the Virginia Department of Health, said that confusion between fission and fusion has been a common cause for misplaced concerns among community members surrounding Commonwealth Fusion Systems’ proposed fusion plant site near Richmond, Va.
Zixu Xu, Guofeng Qu, Min Yan, Su Shen, Yu Huang, Xin Zhang, Lei Chen, Xingquan Liu, Jifeng Han
Nuclear Technology | Volume 208 | Number 12 | December 2022 | Pages 1847-1857
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2022.2076489
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The performance of a prompt gamma neutron activation analysis (PGNAA) system for lower-weight landmine detection is investigated in this study. A total of 2880 characteristic gamma-ray spectra of 10 buried samples (five explosives and five nonexplosives), within a weight range of 0.01 to 10 kg and a hidden depth of 2.5 to 15 cm, under 0%, 10%, and 20% soil moisture conditions, were generated using Monte Carlo N-Particle Code 5 (MCNP5). The conventional characteristic peak analysis method was not applicable to lower-weight sample detection. The discrimination accuracy was acceptable only under 0% soil moisture when explosives exceeded 2 kg with the discrimination accuracy exceeding 80%. Four machine learning models, including radial basis function (RBF) neural network, fully connected neural network, XGBoost, and LightGBM, were used to perform whole-spectrum analysis, and better performance was demonstrated. The discrimination accuracy exceeded 90% in most cases, and the RBF neural network was demonstrated to be the best performance (96.6% for explosives and 95.1% for nonexplosives). All four of these models were insensitive to soil moisture. The minimum detectable weight of 0.02 kg for the simulation data provided valuable reference for experimental applications. These results indicate that machine learning was an effective method for lower-weight landmine detection using PGNAA under complicated conditions.