ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Feb 2026
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
March 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
January 2026
Latest News
Fusion energy: Progress, partnerships, and the path to deployment
Over the past decade, fusion energy has moved decisively from scientific aspiration toward a credible pathway to a new energy technology. Thanks to long-term federal support, we have significantly advanced our fundamental understanding of plasma physics—the behavior of the superheated gases at the heart of fusion devices. This knowledge will enable the creation and control of fusion fuel under conditions required for future power plants. Our progress is exemplified by breakthroughs at the National Ignition Facility and the Joint European Torus.
Jichong Lei, Zhenping Chen, Jiandong Zhou, Chao Yang, Changan Ren, Wei Li, Chao Xie, Zining Ni, Gan Huang, Leiming Li, Jinsen Xie, Tao Yu
Nuclear Technology | Volume 208 | Number 7 | July 2022 | Pages 1223-1232
Technical Note | doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2021.2018270
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The reactor core design involves the search for and detailed calculation of a large number of schemes. Four different machine learning algorithms were used in this technical note: the C4.5 algorithm (an algorithm of decision trees), Support Vector Machine, Random Forest, and Multi-layer Perceptron, respectively. Uranium enrichment, the number of fuel rods containing burnable poison, and the concentration of burnable poison were taken as independent variables in the calculation. The k-eff unevenness coefficient, the radial power nonuniformity coefficient, the radial flux nonuniformity coefficient, and the core life were taken as the number of core parameters fulfilled (CPF). Machine learning models were constructed through learning the training data set, which consisted of a large number of assembly and core schemes whose nuclear design parameters were already known. Using the models, the CPF values for the unknown core data set (the test data set) were quickly predicted. The results show that the cross-validation accuracy of each algorithm was above 94% and that the C4.5 algorithm had the highest accuracy for the overall prediction of the CPF values. For the CPF value prediction of the test data set, the time for the training data set was within 10s, while the Random Forest algorithm has the highest prediction accuracy for CPF = 4 or CPF ≠ 4.