ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Decommissioning & Environmental Sciences
The mission of the Decommissioning and Environmental Sciences (DES) Division is to promote the development and use of those skills and technologies associated with the use of nuclear energy and the optimal management and stewardship of the environment, sustainable development, decommissioning, remediation, reutilization, and long-term surveillance and maintenance of nuclear-related installations, and sites. The target audience for this effort is the membership of the Division, the Society, and the public at large.
Meeting Spotlight
2024 ANS Annual Conference
June 16–19, 2024
Las Vegas, NV|Mandalay Bay Resort and Casino
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2024
Jan 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
April 2024
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
February 2024
Latest News
Can hydrogen be the transportation fuel in an otherwise nuclear economy?
Let’s face it: The global economy should be powered primarily by nuclear power. And it probably will by the end of this century, with a still-significant assist from renewables and hydro. Once nuclear systems are dominant, the costs come down to where gas is now; and when carbon emissions are reduced to a small portion of their present state, it will become obvious that most other sources are only good in niche settings. I mean, why use small modular reactors to load-follow when they can just produce that power instead of buffering it?
Rei Kimura, Shohei Kanamura, Yuya Takahashi, Kazuhito Asano
Nuclear Technology | Volume 207 | Number 11 | November 2021 | Pages 1784-1792
Regular Technical Paper | doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2020.1843953
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The small modular reactor (SMR) is considered one of the important energy sources for the realization of the de-carbonated society, especially SMR types that have 10 MW or less thermal power, called a microreactor or very small modular reactor (vSMR). Toshiba Energy Systems & Solutions has initiated the development of a multipurpose vSMR as a distributed energy source since 2017 called MoveluXTM (Mobile-Very-small reactor for Local Utility in X-mark).
In the current core design, a passive reactivity control device is required from the viewpoint of passive nuclear safety and operational cost reduction. The fundamental idea of vSMR passive reactivity control devices is based on the lithium expansion module (LEM) proposed by Kambe, et al. [“Startup Sequence of RAPID-L Fast Reactor for Lunar Base Power System,” Proc. Space Nuclear Conference, (2007)], however, the LEM has some issues regarding the lithium neutron absorber, such as production costs, chemical reactivity, and tritium generation. In the present study, the In-Gd alloy is proposed as an alternative to 6Li.
The In-Gd alloy is chemically stable in the air atmosphere; additionally, indium and gadolinium have enough neutron absorption cross section without isotope enrichment. However, the density, thermal expansion, and exothermal heat characteristics are not available, which is important information from the viewpoint of neutronics and safety. Hence, the material properties in the In-Gd alloy were measured, such as temperature-dependent density and chemical reactivity. Furthermore, control rod reactivity worth was evaluated based on the measured density.
As a result, the 1 wt% gadolinium contained in the In-Gd alloy shows control rod reactivity worth that is 2.5 times greater than natural lithium. Furthermore, the uncertainty of the In-Gd alloy density has a small impact on the reactivity worth; only in the range of 78 pcm (equivalent to 1% of insertion position) in the case of the 0.1 g/cm3 perturbation of the In-Gd alloy density. In conclusion, the present study shows the advantage and feasibility of the In-Gd alloy as a liquid neutron absorber for the Indium-Gadolinium Expansion Module.