ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
September 8–11, 2025
Atlanta, GA|Atlanta Marriott Marquis
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2025
Nuclear Technology
August 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Deep Space: The new frontier of radiation controls
In commercial nuclear power, there has always been a deliberate tension between the regulator and the utility owner. The regulator fundamentally exists to protect the worker, and the utility, to make a profit. It is a win-win balance.
From the U.S. nuclear industry has emerged a brilliantly successful occupational nuclear safety record—largely the result of an ALARA (as low as reasonably achievable) process that has driven exposure rates down to what only a decade ago would have been considered unthinkable. In the U.S. nuclear industry, the system has accomplished an excellent, nearly seamless process that succeeds to the benefit of both employee and utility owner.
B. P. Bromley, Z. Cheng, A. Nava Dominguez, A. V. Colton
Nuclear Technology | Volume 207 | Number 10 | October 2021 | Pages 1511-1537
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2020.1827658
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
This paper reports the results of subchannel thermal-hydraulic studies (using the ASSERT-PV code) of the effects of variations and uncertainties in operating/boundary conditions and geometry on the predictions of pressure drop, dryout power, and dryout location for two types of advanced, nonconventional fuels in a pressure tube heavy water reactor (PT-HWR) fuel channel with 12 fuel bundles. The fuel bundles tested include a 37-element fuel bundle made with SEUO2 (1.2 wt% 235U/U), with a central fuel element made of ThO2, and 35-element fuel bundle made with (LEU,Th)O2, using 5 wt% 235U/U low-enriched uranium (LEU), 50 wt% LEUO2, and 50 wt% ThO2. Results indicate that for a range of flow conditions, the dryout power for the thorium-based 35-element fuel bundle is 10% to 26% higher than that for the uranium-based 37-element fuel bundle. Variation/uncertainty in the pressure tube diameter has the most significant impact on the pressure drop, dryout power, and dryout location. Results from these studies may have implications for the operations of PT-HWRs with advanced fuels, and further modifications may be desirable to further enhance thermal-hydraulic margins.
