ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Feb 2026
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
March 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
January 2026
Latest News
From SPARC to ARC: CFS prepares for a first-of-a-kind fusion plant
Commonwealth Fusion Systems makes no small plans. The company wants to build a 400-MWe magnetic confinement fusion power plant called ARC near Richmond, Va., and begin operating it in the early 2030s. And the plans don’t end there. CFS wants to deploy “thousands” of fusion power plants capable of accelerating a global energy transition.
Cihang Lu, Zeyun Wu, Xu Wu
Nuclear Technology | Volume 207 | Number 5 | May 2021 | Pages 692-710
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2020.1805259
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Thermal stratification (TS) is a thermal-fluid phenomenon that can introduce large uncertainties to nuclear reactor safety. The stratified layers caused by TS can lead to temperature oscillations in the reactor core. They can also result in damages to both the reactor vessel and in-vessel components due to the growth of thermal fatigue cracks. More importantly, TS can impede the establishment of natural circulation, which is widely used for passive cooling and ensures the inherent safety of numerous reactor designs. A fast-running one-dimensional (1-D) model was recently developed in our research group to predict the TS phenomenon in pool-type sodium-cooled fast reactors. The efficient 1-D model provided reasonable temperature predictions for the test conditions investigated, but nonnegligible discrepancies between the 1-D predictions and the experimental temperature measurements were observed. These discrepancies are attributed to the model uncertainties (also known as model bias or errors) in the 1-D model and the parameter uncertainties in the input parameters.
In this study, we first recognized through a forward uncertainty analysis that the observed discrepancies between the computational predictions and the experimental temperature measurements could not be explained solely by input uncertainty propagation. We then performed an inverse uncertainty quantification (UQ) study to reduce the model uncertainties of the 1-D model using a modular Bayesian approach based on experimental data. Inverse UQ serves as a data assimilation process to simultaneously minimize the mismatches between the predictions and experimental measurements, while quantifying the associated parameter uncertainties. The solutions of the modular Bayesian approach were in the form of posterior probability density functions, which were explored by rigorous Markov Chain Monte Carlo sampling. Results showed that the quantified parameters obtained from the inverse UQ effectively improved the predictive capability of the 1-D TS model.