ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
August 2026
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
NEPA review changes coming under NRC proposed rule
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is proposing changes to its environmental review regulations under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) that agency officials call the most significant in decades.
The proposed rule—published in the Federal Register on Tuesday—streamlines 10 CFR Part 51 and calls for no longer requiring draft environmental impact statements (EIS), adding new categorical exclusions that exempt licensing actions from NEPA review, and reducing the regulatory burden in its environmental reviews, among other things. The NRC will accept public comments on the proposed rulemaking until August 21, with plans to hold a public hearing during the comment period.
Peter Yarsky, Andrew Bielen
Nuclear Technology | Volume 207 | Number 4 | April 2021 | Pages 627-635
Technical Note | doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2020.1774260
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff often perform confirmatory analyses using the TRAC/RELAP Advanced Computational Engine (TRACE) and Purdue Advanced Reactor Core Simulator (PARCS) codes to assist in regulatory decision making. Recently, the NRC staff have performed numerous such analyses of anticipated transient without SCRAM (ATWS) with core instability (ATWS-I) scenarios for boiling water reactor license amendment requests to expand the power/flow operating domain. In the conduct of these confirmatory analyses, the staff have simulated oscillatory conditions in the reactor core under certain ATWS conditions that result in regional mode (or out-of-phase mode) power oscillations. The nature of these regional oscillations may present a challenge to fuel damage limits. Therefore, there has been interest in methods to identify the most limiting point in cycle exposure. It has been conventional wisdom that the core is most susceptible to regional mode oscillations when the fission cross section is greatest, leading to the common practice of analyzing these events at the peak hot excess (PHE) exposure point in the cycle. The staff have found some limitations in applying the PHE concept in a consistent manner. In the current work, the NRC staff have developed a more rigorous method for identifying the most limiting cycle exposure by directly considering the core flow rate, the axial power distribution, the first harmonic mode shape, and the eigenvalue separation between the fundamental and first harmonic modes. This method is a more rigorous method to screen the various exposures between beginning and end of cycle. An example case is shown to demonstrate the application of this methodology.