ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Radiation Protection & Shielding
The Radiation Protection and Shielding Division is developing and promoting radiation protection and shielding aspects of nuclear science and technology — including interaction of nuclear radiation with materials and biological systems, instruments and techniques for the measurement of nuclear radiation fields, and radiation shield design and evaluation.
Meeting Spotlight
2024 ANS Annual Conference
June 16–19, 2024
Las Vegas, NV|Mandalay Bay Resort and Casino
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
May 2024
Jan 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
June 2024
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Strong performances across the board
Craig Piercycpiercy@ans.org
Another year, another stellar performance by America’s nuclear plants. We’ve come to expect high capacity factors, and it’s a credit to the men and women of the profession. They’ve made routine something that was unimaginable not so long ago.
The decadal challenge for the nuclear enterprise now is to maintain this high level of operational excellence for the current fleet, while at the same time ushering in a new generation of technologies at scale. It will be a big job—but one that seems more and more likely with each passing day.
S. Wang, T. Beuthe, X. Huang, A. Nava Dominguez, B. P. Bromley, A. V. Colton
Nuclear Technology | Volume 207 | Number 4 | April 2021 | Pages 494-520
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2020.1784669
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The use of advanced uranium-based and thorium-based fuel bundles in pressure tube heavy water reactors (PT-HWRs) has the potential to improve the utilization of uranium resources while also providing improvements in performance and safety characteristics of PT-HWRs. Earlier lattice physics and reactor core physics studies have demonstrated the feasibility of using such advanced fuels; however, thermal-hydraulic (T-H) studies are required to confirm that these advanced fuels will have adequate T-H safety margins. Preliminary system T-H transient simulations have been carried out for a 700-MW(electric)–class PT-HWR in a postulated loss-of-coolant accident (LOCA) using the CATHENA code. One purpose of this work was to demonstrate that such simulations of a PT-HWR filled entirely with advanced fuels could be set up and executed successfully in a CATHENA transient simulation model. The other purpose was to evaluate the peak sheath and peak fuel centerline temperatures during a LOCA to perform an analysis that compares the relative performance of each of the proposed advanced fuels. System T-H simulations with CATHENA were performed to model a postulated LOCA event with a 20% inlet header break in a typical 700-MW(electric)–class PT-HWR using two types of advanced uranium-based and thorium-based fuel bundles in modified 37-element and 35-element geometries. Calculations were also performed for a PT-HWR using conventional natural uranium fuel in 37-element fuel bundles for comparison. In the event of a LOCA, there is a drop in the primary circuit pressure. It is assumed that there is a 2-s delay between the signal of the low primary pressure and the tripping of the reactor. When the reactor trips, the shutdown rods are inserted. The reactor trip is followed by the activation of the emergency core cooling system, which occurs 30 s after the LOCA starts, with a trip signal on the boiler crash cooling. Simulation results for the LOCA demonstrated that the peak fuel centerline temperatures (ranging from 1822°C to 2183°C) were several hundred degrees below the expected melting point of UO2 (~2865°C). Simulations also demonstrated that the peak sheath temperatures for the advanced fuel concepts ranged from 1177°C to 1204°C, which are lower than that with conventional NU fuel in 37-element fuel bundles. Thus, the system T-H analysis of the relative results provides confidence in the proposed advanced uranium-based and thorium-based fuel concepts for potential use in PT-HWRs.