ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2026
Nuclear Technology
August 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
The human factor in licensing and operating the next generation of nuclear plants
As human factors specialists working at the intersection of human performance and nuclear operations, we are witnessing one of the nuclear sector’s most significant transitions in decades. The emergence of small modular reactors, microreactors, and other advanced designs is reshaping the industry’s landscape. Digital instrumentation and controls, passive safety systems, and increased automation are creating opportunities for greater safety margins and more flexible operation. These same features also fundamentally redefine what it means to “operate” a nuclear plant. Interactions among human roles, automation, and passive systems shape how people maintain awareness, exercise judgment, and intervene when necessary. These developments affect both operational realities and the regulatory foundations on which nuclear safety is built.
G. D. Latimer, W. R. Marcum, W. F. Jones
Nuclear Technology | Volume 206 | Number 9 | September 2020 | Pages 1374-1384
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2020.1712158
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
In this study a series of experiments were performed subjecting surrogate nuclear fuel rods to high-pressure transients to induce fuel dispersion representative of the expected conditions of a fuel rod during a hypothetical loss-of-coolant accident. Experiments were conducted on like-for-like pressurized water reactor geometries in both a single-rod and rod-bundle configuration. In the rod-bundle configuration, a matched index of refraction techniques was employed to provide optical access to the bundle internals and to view the surrogate fuel dispersion event. Both configurations used small lead pellets as a surrogate fuel and were observed with a high-speed camera to capture the transient on a resolved timescale. For the single-rod experiments, the test rod was subjected to pressure transients at 4.0, 8.0, and 12.0 MPa multiple times, and for the rod-bundle experiments, the rod was subjected to 8.0 MPa transients in order to compare mechanical behavior against the single-rod test at 8.0 MPa. For both configurations, the results showed highly variable behavior in both the quantity of fuel dispersed and the mean displacement relative to the burst rod origin, likely due to statistical variations in the internal fuel stack orientation. Measurements of the rod plenum internal pressure showed no discernible difference in depressurization rates at a given pressure, indicating the likelihood that the mass flow rate is limited by the valve orifice in the current experimental configuration. The bundle tests also showed that a 5 × 5 array appears to be too small to capture the full spatial distribution of dispersed fuel, thus future tests will employ a larger bundle size and particle collection technique.