ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
May 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
June 2026
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Savannah River marks the closure of another legacy waste tank
The Department of Energy’s Office of Environmental Management has received concurrence from regulators that Tank 14 at the Savannah River Site has reached preliminary cease waste removal (PCWR) status after radioactive liquid waste was successfully removed from the tank. PCWR is a regulatory milestone in the closure of SRS’s old-style waste tanks, which were built in the 1950s to store waste generated by the chemical separations of plutonium and uranium.
Ming Wang, Jinxing Zheng, Yuntao Song, Xianhu Zeng, Ming Li, Wuquan Zhang, Pengyu Wang, Junsong Shen
Nuclear Technology | Volume 206 | Number 5 | May 2020 | Pages 779-790
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2019.1670011
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The superconducting isochronous cyclotron SC200 for proton therapy is under development in Hefei, and the active scanning method has been selected as the beam delivery technology. To reduce energy loss and transverse scattering of the proton beam, a gas chamber in the pencil beam scanning (PBS) nozzle has been designed to shorten the length of the air segment. To determine whether using a helium filling gas or vacuum is the most suitable for the SC200 PBS nozzle, the beam size and the energy loss at the isocenter and the dose distribution in the water phantom are compared using the TOol for PArticle Simulation (TOPAS) code. The results show that using the helium filling gas resulted in scattering and energy loss of the proton beam compared with using vacuum, but these effects were minimal. Considering the disadvantages of the engineering problems of creating a vacuum chamber, helium was selected as the filling gas for the PBS nozzle chamber. Moreover, the following parameters were analyzed and optimized: gas pressure, gas purity, and film thickness of the chamber. When the helium pressure was below 1.1 atm and the air proportion was less than 5%, the beam size at the lowest energy of the proton beam at the isocenter was lower than 8 mm, meeting the clinical requirements.