ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jun 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
July 2026
Nuclear Technology
June 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
May 2026
Latest News
North American construction is back—smaller and faster—at OPG’s Darlington
“The nuclear renaissance is real here,” said Ontario Power Generation’s Subo Sinnathamby on May 8, one year to the day after OPG secured a final investment decision to build the first of four planned BWRX-300 reactors at its Darlington nuclear power plant, and shortly after the new reactor’s foundation was lifted into place. “We got our license to construct in April and our [final investment decision] in May, and we’ve been off to the races since.”
Te-Chuan Wang, Min Lee
Nuclear Technology | Volume 206 | Number 3 | March 2020 | Pages 414-427
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2019.1653152
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
MAAP5 is an integral severe accident analysis program that simulates the responses of a light water reactor power plant during a severe accident. This program has been used extensively for probabilistic safety assessments, verification and validation of mitigation actions specified in severe accident management guidelines, and source term quantification. In this study, the uncertainty of in-vessel hydrogen generation predicted by the MAAP5 code was quantified. The surrogate plant that was analyzed is the Lungmen Nuclear Power Station of the Taiwan Power Company. The plant employs an advanced boiling water reactor. We performed sensitivity studies to identify the important model parameters that affect the target output parameters. A range and distribution were assigned to these parameters on the basis of experimental results and expert judgment. The number of input parameters in the analysis was 27. Multiple MAAP5 calculations were performed with an input combination generated from Latin hypercube sampling. The calculation results were analyzed parametrically and nonparametrically to determine the 95th percentile with the 95% confidence level value of the amount of in-vessel hydrogen generation. The Pearson correlation coefficient was used to determine the effect of the model parameters on the target output parameters. The analysis results provide guidance for code applications. The only parameters that pass the threshold of 0.362 for hydrogen generation in the core are FCO and TCLMAX. For hydrogen generation in the lower plenum, FOXBJ is the only input parameter that passes the threshold.